Bug 647 - in text installer: unpartitioned space is wrongly reported
Summary: in text installer: unpartitioned space is wrongly reported
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installer (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: i586 Linux
Priority: Low major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pascal Terjan
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: NEEDINFO
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-04-05 23:02 CEST by AL13N
Modified: 2012-06-14 22:08 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: drakxtools
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments
weird disk overview (5.43 KB, image/png)
2011-04-05 23:04 CEST, AL13N
Details
Normal disk overview (7.99 KB, image/png)
2011-04-06 00:57 CEST, Pascal Terjan
Details
after typing a partition size and it's once too high, the start sector is being decreased (4.88 KB, image/png)
2012-03-09 18:04 CET, AL13N
Details

Description AL13N 2011-04-05 23:02:52 CEST
Description of problem:

text installer, diskdrake, VM with 8GB disk, i entered a 7000MB disk first, and after creation, i choose "choose different partition" and i get back to disk overview, and it lists unpartitioned space as 1.9TB instead of +-1GB. this is clearly wrong.

Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 AL13N 2011-04-05 23:04:35 CEST
Created attachment 200 [details]
weird disk overview

this is the disk overview after making 1 / partition of 7000MB and 1 swap partition of 800MB on a VM disk of 8GB.

seeing this, i have no confidence whatsoever if this is going to turn out ok.
Comment 2 AL13N 2011-04-05 23:07:20 CEST
after trying to go ahead, it gave errors, (that should be obvious), i had to search to find the default option of using available space... which seemed to work well.
Comment 3 Pascal Terjan 2011-04-06 00:57:32 CEST
Created attachment 202 [details]
Normal disk overview

Can you detail how you created partitions?
I just tried and could not reproduce
Comment 4 AL13N 2011-04-06 01:13:22 CEST
well, hmmm

ok.

first, this is a vbox install with 8GB disk. not kvm or qemu, don't know if it matters.

i did a bit of a mess though:


1. i created a partition and deleted it again
2. created it then but too high, 9000MB
3. looked at the disk info, it was totally bonkers 1.9TB 
4. deleted it, and typed in 19000MB
5. looked at disk info
6. deleted it again.
7. created with 7000 /
8. selected the 'wrong' unpartition size
9. created with 800 swap
10. noticed that sda5 was now above sda1 and had 2 weird unallocated spaces in between...

in your screenshot, where is your unallocated space?
Thierry Vignaud 2011-08-09 12:01:13 CEST

CC: (none) => thierry.vignaud
Summary: in text installer: unparitioned space is wrongly reported => in text installer: unpartitioned space is wrongly reported

AL13N 2011-10-30 11:32:35 CET

Blocks: (none) => 1994

Comment 5 Marja Van Waes 2011-12-23 14:36:18 CET
@ AL13N

Can you reproduce this bug with Mga2a2?

If so, can you only reproduce it by first trying to make a partition that is larger than your disk?

Setting the severity to low, because hardly anyone does a text install

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
Priority: Normal => Low
CC: (none) => marja11
Source RPM: (none) => drakxtools

Comment 6 Marja Van Waes 2012-01-18 07:40:21 CET
Please reply to the question above within two weeks from now, to avoid this bug being closed as OLD. (If you need more time, please say so)
Comment 7 Marja Van Waes 2012-02-03 13:38:02 CET
(In reply to comment #6)
> Please reply to the question above within two weeks from now, to avoid this bug
> being closed as OLD. (If you need more time, please say so)

giving you 2 weeks extra time, you mentioned on IRC how busy you are :)
Comment 8 Marja Van Waes 2012-02-18 21:40:04 CET
2 weeks extra have passed ;)

Since there are insufficient details provided in this report for us to investigate the issue further, and we have not received feedback to the information we have requested above, we will assume the problem was not reproducible, or has been fixed in one of the updates we have released for the reporter's distribution.

Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest update of their distribution, and if this issue turns out to still be reproducible in the latest update, please reopen this bug with additional information.

Closing as OLD.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => OLD

Comment 9 AL13N 2012-03-09 17:58:05 CET
i'm sorry, the text installer was broken, so i couldn't test :-)

now i have an update to this bug.

it seems that the bug likely stems from the starting sector being accomodated, if you enter a number that's too high (even if it means colliding with other partitions, or even going negative in start sector).

i'll post some screenshots

Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Resolution: OLD => (none)

Comment 10 AL13N 2012-03-09 18:04:22 CET
Created attachment 1711 [details]
after typing a partition size and it's once too high, the start sector is being decreased

thing is, if there's partition before, or whatever, the start sector shouldn't be decreased.

i mean, if you want to enter a number in it, you are in front of the numbers, typing any number in it, will make the number 10 times as high, which is likely to go too high, immediately the starting sector is modified...

i'd rather like to see a marking or color red, if too high, and being checked when pressing next, rather than the starting sector being modified.

it was especially irritating when making a second partition, because, i can't remember what the starting sector was before... somewhere a number in the millions...

one can confirm this by using the boot.iso and networkbooting the text installer
Manuel Hiebel 2012-03-09 21:29:32 CET

Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)

Comment 11 Marja Van Waes 2012-03-10 08:14:56 CET
@ pterjan

assigning to you, because I understood you're the diskdrake guy :)

Please assign back if I'm wrong (or assign on to the right person)

Assignee: bugsquad => pterjan

Comment 12 AL13N 2012-04-07 12:44:29 CEST
still there, see bug 648 as well
Comment 13 AL13N 2012-04-07 12:45:08 CEST
i meant bug 646
Manuel Hiebel 2012-04-25 22:32:49 CEST

Blocks: 1994 => (none)

Comment 14 Marja Van Waes 2012-05-26 13:03:03 CEST
Hi,

This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment.

Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2.

Thanks :)

Cheers,
marja

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO

Comment 15 AL13N 2012-06-14 22:08:09 CEST
fixed together with that other bug

Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.