Bug 7384 - urpmi: packageand() support
Summary: urpmi: packageand() support
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 3536
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-09-07 11:46 CEST by Olav Vitters
Modified: 2012-09-09 16:18 CEST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: urpmi
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Olav Vitters 2012-09-07 11:46:29 CEST 
Could you please add support to urpmi for packageand()

I have a need for it in bug 3536.

Basically:
canberra has gtk+2.x and gtk+3.x subpackages

As soon as either subpackage is installed, both GTK+ versions will try and load the canberra module. But someone might not have gtk+2.x!

I'd like something like:

canberra package:
Requires: packageand(gtk+2.x,canberra-gtk0)
Requires: packageand(gtk+3.x,canberra-gtk3)

canberra-gtk0 as well as canberra-gtk3 require the base canberra package btw.
Olav Vitters 2012-09-07 11:46:46 CEST

Blocks: (none) => 3536

Manuel Hiebel 2012-09-09 15:14:14 CEST

CC: (none) => thierry.vignaud
Source RPM: (none) => urpmi

Comment 1 Thierry Vignaud 2012-09-09 16:18:20 CEST 
Those are rpm tags, there's nothing urpmi can do.
"Requires: packageand(gtk+2.x,canberra-gtk0)" is the same as
"Requires: gtk+2.x canberra-gtk0" anyway

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.