Bug 6661 - a python-qt4-demos package is missing
Summary: a python-qt4-demos package is missing
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6660
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New RPM package request (show other bugs)
Version: 2
Hardware: i586 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 6660
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-07-02 11:52 CEST by Yann COLLETTE
Modified: 2012-07-21 00:33 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: python-qt4
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Yann COLLETTE 2012-07-02 11:52:56 CEST 
The python demo files of qt4 are missing.
A package python-qt4-demo should be added.

YC
Manuel Hiebel 2012-07-02 12:13:42 CEST

Source RPM: (none) => python-qt4

Damien Lallement 2012-07-18 02:43:18 CEST

CC: (none) => mageia
Assignee: bugsquad => nicolas.lecureuil

Comment 1 Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-18 02:44:57 CEST 
what do you mean by demos ? are you talking about the examples ? if yes i can create a subpackage and add them.

CC: (none) => nicolas.lecureuil
Assignee: nicolas.lecureuil => bugsquad

Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-18 02:45:28 CEST

Assignee: bugsquad => nicolas.lecureuil

Comment 2 Yann COLLETTE 2012-07-19 19:19:34 CEST 
Yes, you're right, I was thinking about the examples directory of PyQt4.
These examples are useful when you learn pyqt ...

Thanks,

YC
Comment 3 Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-19 19:56:33 CEST 
ok then, i will do a example subpackage and don update for mageia 2
Comment 4 Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-20 01:00:20 CEST 
please test package from updates_testing.

will fix 6660 too
Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-20 22:37:16 CEST

Assignee: nicolas.lecureuil => bugsquad

Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-21 00:28:36 CEST

Depends on: (none) => 6660

Comment 5 Nicolas Lécureuil 2012-07-21 00:33:27 CEST 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6660 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.