Bug 4814 - Backport of volumeicon from Cauldron
Summary: Backport of volumeicon from Cauldron
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New RPM package request (show other bugs)
Version: 1
Hardware: i586 Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Armando Basile
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: OK cauldron
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-06 16:02 CET by Armando Basile
Modified: 2012-12-02 14:31 CET (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: volumeicon-0.4.6-2.mga1.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Armando Basile 2012-03-06 16:02:57 CET
There is now volumeicon-0.4.6 in core/updates_testing to validate
-------------------------------------------------------


Suggested advisory:
-------------------
already present in Cauldron, is a backport

isn't present in Mandriva 2010.2 but i using it already in my HTPC with Mageia 1:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/File:Openbox.png
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Hman/MediaCenter_with_Mageia
Comment 1 Samuel Verschelde 2012-03-06 16:06:46 CET
You can't submit a backport to core/updates_testing, I'm sorry. We need backports media for that, and they still aren't open unfortunately.

CC: (none) => stormi
Assignee: qa-bugs => hmandevteam

Comment 2 Armando Basile 2012-03-06 16:15:52 CET
Yes, i read it, but i read also:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mgarepo#The_package_doesn.27t_exist_yet_in_Mageia_1

so i follow this steps
Comment 3 Samuel Verschelde 2012-03-06 16:36:01 CET
You told "isn't present in Mandriva 2010.2", so this package doesn't qualify to "There is however an exception for Mageia, on packages that were available in Mandriva 2010.2 but were forgotten in Mageia 1".

Please also specify in your other bug reports if the package was present in Mandriva 2010.2
Comment 4 Armando Basile 2012-03-06 16:41:12 CET
Ok, i know, sorry 

thanks
Comment 5 claire robinson 2012-03-06 17:11:31 CET
This one is actually in 2010.2. It is in contrib-backports (0.4.1-3mdv2010.2)

What is our policy on upgrading from 2010.2 backports, it seems sensible to allow for that. I think the only real problem is the yajl package which isn't in Mandriva 2010.2 at all.
Comment 6 Armando Basile 2012-03-07 14:21:16 CET
yes, i already closed yajl bug:
http://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4817
Comment 7 Dave Hodgins 2012-03-07 20:17:53 CET
If we start making exceptions for Mandriva 2010.2 backports (which we
haven't so far), we are risking massive complications due to bug 2317.

While volumeicon doesn't have any version specific requires, consider
the following scenario.

A user upgrades from 2010.2 to Mageia 1.  They have backports installed
with some version specific requires on some packages that we have in
core release.  Those core release packages get blocked during the
upgrade, due to the backport package not being in Mageia 1.

We add the backport as an update.  User tries to install the update
using mgaapplet.  As the version specific required package from core
is not in updates, the update will be rejected due to bug 2317.

Our current depcheck script doesn't handle new packages, so we'll
have to write a new one that can get old requires from the Mandriva
repositories in order to determine which packages need linking from
Core release to core updates.

I'd have to dig through the mailing lists, but if I remember
correctly, Mageia 1 only supported upgrading from Mandriva with
plf, but not with backports.

I think this should be discussed on the developers mailing list,
as well as the sysadmin mailing list, before accepting new packages
as updates, that were only in backports in Mandriva 2010.2.

CC: (none) => davidwhodgins

Comment 8 Dave Hodgins 2012-03-12 07:57:38 CET
Sorry for the delay.  I've finally gotten around to posting the
question to the developers mailing list.  Please be patient while
the option to allow 2010.2 backports under the exception is discussed.

As will be clear from my wording of the article, I'm against it, but
due to bug 2317, I'm willing to keep an open mind, if anyone has
a way of solving that bug.
Comment 9 Armando Basile 2012-03-12 09:06:01 CET
Hi Dave, i understand your point of view, of course there are applications that requires many dependencies where tracking is costly and other (specially bytecode in java or mono or python) where is more simple tracking. I know also that we need of unique rule to manage package submission, distinguish case for case would be impossible to manage.
Comment 10 Marja Van Waes 2012-07-06 12:57:46 CEST
putting OK on the whiteboard, because the assignee has evidently been working on this backport

CC: (none) => marja11
Whiteboard: (none) => OK

Manuel Hiebel 2012-10-31 20:14:28 CET

Component: RPM Packages => New RPM package request
Whiteboard: OK => OK cauldron

Comment 11 Manuel Hiebel 2012-11-05 16:51:58 CET
This message is a reminder that Mageia 1 is nearing its end of life. 
In approximately 25 days from now, Mageia will stop maintaining and issuing 
updates for Mageia 1. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX (EOL) if it 
remains open with a Mageia 'version' of '1'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to 
fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later 
Mageia version prior to Mageia 1's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not 
be able to fix it before Mageia 1 is end of life.  If you would still like to see 
this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Mageia, 
you are encouraged to click on "Version" and change it against that version 
of Mageia.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, 
sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Mageia 
release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.

--
Mageia Bugsquad
Comment 12 Manuel Hiebel 2012-12-02 14:31:46 CET
Mageia 1 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on ''1st December''. Mageia 1 is no 
longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or 
bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. 

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Mageia 
please feel free to click on "Version" change it against that version of Mageia and reopen this bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

--
Mageia Bugsquad

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.