Description of problem: Latest updates disabled fglrx driver. Manual installation hangs on "unsutisfied x11-server-common" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Reproducible: Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 147 [details] error image
Well, if you have the fglrx driver installed, you'd get something like this when updating: # urpmi --auto-select -v getting lock on urpmi examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release (coffee1)/synthesis.hdlist.cz] examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Nonfree Release (coffee11)/synthesis.hdlist.cz] getting exclusive lock on rpm The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded: dkms-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied x11-driver-video-fglrx == 8.821) x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 (due to conflicts with xserver-abi(videodrv-10)) (y/N) Which is the correct behaviour, current fglrx driver doesn't support X server 1.10, your options would be to not update X server (and the other X relevant packages) to keep the fglrx driver working. Or to update the system and switch to the open source driver until fglrx supports X server 1.10. However trying to install x11-driver-video-fglrx after installing X server 1.10, the message given by urpmi isn't clear enough, the actual reason can be seen with --debug: # urpmi --test --debug x11-driver-video-fglrx [...] search_packages: found x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 matching x11-driver-video-fglrx found package(s): x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 opening rpmdb (root=, write=) selecting x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 requiring kmod(fglrx)[== 8.821],x11-server-common[>= 1.9] for x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 installed package x11-server-common-1.10.0-1.mga1.x86_64 is conflicting with x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 (Conflicts: xserver-abi(videodrv-10)) set_rejected: x11-server-common-1.10.0-1.mga1.x86_64 no packages match x11-server-common[>= 1.9] (it is either in skip.list or already rejected) unselecting x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 adding a reason to already rejected package x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64: unsatisfied x11-server-common[>= 1.9] A requested package cannot be installed: x11-driver-video-fglrx-8.821-3.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied x11-server-common[>= 1.9]) Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) so it's failing because it conflicts with xserver-abi(videodrv-10), not due to unsatisfied x11-server-common. Keeping this report open so that the message printed by urpmi is improved as much as possible...
Keywords: (none) => TriagedCC: (none) => ahmadsamir3891Assignee: bugsquad => anssi.hannula
CC: (none) => olivierHardware: i586 => All
In 1-alpha2 (x86_64), fglrx can't be installed because of "unsutisfied x11-server-common"
fglrx-8.831.2 should be on the mirrors soon, please test. (this one supports with X server 1.10)
Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
It works. Btw, pressing 'Test' botton from XFdrake gives segmentation fault screen (see attachment)
Created attachment 189 [details] Segmentation fault message
Installation works but I have also a bug. (EE) Screen 1 deleted because of no matching config section. libGL symbol link files sanity check failed
This bug is fixed. The issue in comment#7 is tracked in bug 641, I think.
Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => FIXED
No, this bug is not fixed. I have a laptop (acer aspire 4820TG) with a graphic chipset on the intel i5 processor, and a graphic card : ati radeon HD 6550M whose does not work. If I use only ati radeon with fglrx : XFrake gives (EE) Screen 1 deleted because of no matching config section. libGL symbol link files sanity check failed If I use only ati radeon with ati (free driver): (EE) Failed to load module "glx" (module does not exist, 0) (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported. If I use both with fglrx : The screen goes black and the fan slows If I use both with ati : It works (due to intel i5) This is not the same situation with the bug 641 and I have not two screen. Maybe should I open a new bug report ?
(In reply to comment #9) > No, this bug is not fixed. I have a laptop (acer aspire 4820TG) with a graphic > chipset on the intel i5 processor, and a graphic card : ati radeon HD 6550M > whose does not work. > > If I use only ati radeon with fglrx : XFrake gives > (EE) Screen 1 deleted because of no matching config section. > libGL symbol link files sanity check failed > > If I use only ati radeon with ati (free driver): > (EE) Failed to load module "glx" (module does not exist, 0) > (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported. > > If I use both with fglrx : > The screen goes black and the fan slows > If I use both with ati : > It works (due to intel i5) > > This is not the same situation with the bug 641 and I have not two screen. > Maybe should I open a new bug report ? Yes, open a new report. In the report you open please attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log when you try using fglrx. (By "this bug is fixed" I meant "x11-driver-video-fglrx can't be installed due to unsutisfied x11-server-common").
I have open a new report. See the <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=641">bug 666</a>
(In reply to comment #11) > I have open a new report. See the <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=641">bug 666</a> (Off-topic: bugzilla uses plain text, so <a href=*> won't work, but if simply use 'bug ###' it'll make it a hyperlink automatically on the bug report page).