Fedora has issued an advisory on May 20: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LHFUD3TRXO7AHOVSFWLKP2MKB77PEQBK/ Fix: https://github.com/iputils/iputils/commit/070cfacd7348386173231fb16fad4983d4e6ae40
Source RPM: (none) => iputils-20240905-1.mga10.src.rpm, iputils-20221126-1.mga9.src.rpmStatus comment: (none) => Patch available from upstream and FedoraCVE: (none) => CVE-2025-47268Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9TOO
Suggested advisory: ======================== The updated packages fix a security vulnerability: ping in iputils through 20240905 allows a denial of service (application error or incorrect data collection) via a crafted ICMP Echo Reply packet, because of a signed 64-bit integer overflow in timestamp multiplication. (CVE-2025-47268) References: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LHFUD3TRXO7AHOVSFWLKP2MKB77PEQBK/ ======================== Updated packages in core/updates_testing: ======================== iputils-20221126-1.1.mga9 iputils-ninfod-20221126-1.1.mga9 from SRPM: iputils-20221126-1.1.mga9.src.rpm
Status comment: Patch available from upstream and Fedora => (none)Whiteboard: MGA9TOO => (none)Assignee: bugsquad => qa-bugsSource RPM: iputils-20240905-1.mga10.src.rpm, iputils-20221126-1.mga9.src.rpm => iputils-20221126-1.mga9.src.rpmStatus: NEW => ASSIGNEDVersion: Cauldron => 9
Keywords: (none) => advisory
MGA9-64 Plasma. No installation issues. Tested with several pings: [tom@localhost ~]$ ping localhost PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.024 ms 64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.071 ms 64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.069 ms 64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.069 ms 64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.069 ms ^C --- localhost ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.024/0.060/0.071/0.018 ms Then my router (actual IP disguised): [tom@localhost ~]$ ping XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1 PING XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1 (XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.370 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.334 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.424 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.417 ms ^C --- XXX.YYY.ZZZ.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.334/0.386/0.424/0.036 ms A network device that was powered off: [tom@localhost ~]$ ping XXX.YYY.ZZZ.141 PING XXX.YYY.ZZZ.141 (XXX.YYY.ZZZ.141) 56(84) bytes of data. From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable ping: sendmsg: No route to host From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=11 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=12 Destination Host Unreachable From XXX.YYY.ZZZ.118 icmp_seq=13 Destination Host Unreachable ^C --- XXX.YYY.ZZZ.141 ping statistics --- 16 packets transmitted, 0 received, +12 errors, 100% packet loss, time 15121ms pipe 4 And one that was powered up: [tom@localhost ~]$ ping XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124 PING XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124 (XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.345 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.200 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.198 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.201 ms 64 bytes from XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.193 ms ^C --- XXX.YYY.ZZZ.124 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4040ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.193/0.227/0.345/0.058 ms And finally my favorite search engine: [tom@localhost ~]$ ping duckduckgo.com PING duckduckgo.com (52.149.246.39) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 52.149.246.39 (52.149.246.39): icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=27.0 ms 64 bytes from 52.149.246.39 (52.149.246.39): icmp_seq=2 ttl=113 time=28.1 ms ^C64 bytes from 52.149.246.39: icmp_seq=3 ttl=113 time=26.6 ms --- duckduckgo.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 10115ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.590/27.244/28.109/0.637 ms Looks OK to me.
CC: (none) => andrewsfarmWhiteboard: (none) => MGA9-64-OK
Validating.
CC: (none) => sysadmin-bugsKeywords: (none) => validated_update
An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2025-0163.html
Resolution: (none) => FIXEDStatus: ASSIGNED => RESOLVED
(In reply to Mageia Robot from comment #4) > An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. > > https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2025-0163.html https://flappydunk.io Thanks for update.
CC: (none) => kindrabernier
CC: kindrabernier => (none)