Bug 2819 - freenx, Free NX implementation
Summary: freenx, Free NX implementation
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New RPM package request (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: All Packagers
QA Contact:
URL: http://freenx.berlios.de/
Whiteboard: Mdv
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 2929
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-09-23 21:03 CEST by thierry THunot
Modified: 2016-09-15 11:46 CEST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: freenx
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description thierry THunot 2011-09-23 21:03:49 CEST
create new rpm of freenx server and x2goserver


this package is present in mandriva but not in mageia :(
it usefull to take controle of distant computer
thierry THunot 2011-09-23 21:05:18 CEST

Priority: Normal => High

Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2011-09-23 22:09:05 CEST
can you open a new package request for x2goserver ? (and add one link) thanks.

Priority: High => Normal
URL: (none) => http://freenx.berlios.de/
Summary: add new package in mageia => package request: freenx

Comment 2 r howard 2011-09-25 20:17:41 CEST
Freenx is needed for all platforms.
The lack of Freenx is preventing me from moving to Mageia.
I know I could install the Mandriva Freenx package but I would rather have a Mageia package
It is an essential package for using a system as a concurrent multiuser X windows based system.

CC: (none) => robrthoward
Hardware: i586 => All

Philippe Didier 2011-10-04 20:14:34 CEST

Blocks: (none) => 2929

Comment 3 r howard 2011-11-26 22:52:05 CET
I see that there is source here http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/freenx/ but it does not appear to have actually been built.  Also a dependency is at  http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/nx/ and has not been built.
How do we get those packages built?
Comment 4 Remco Rijnders 2011-11-27 05:03:03 CET
Hi Oliver,

Cc'ing you as you imported nx into svn. Any particular reason it was never built?

Trying to find lebedov's email address so I can ask him the same for the freenx package...

Thanks,

Remmy

CC: (none) => oliver.bgr

Comment 5 Oliver Burger 2011-11-27 23:09:47 CET
Yep,

it does not build and I couldn't find a resolution for this. I have to digg into it (because I would like to add x2go fully).
Comment 6 r howard 2011-11-28 02:59:16 CET
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yep,
> 
> it does not build and I couldn't find a resolution for this. I have to digg
> into it (because I would like to add x2go fully).

Oliver Are you saying the nx package failed to build?  What does x2go have to do with building the nx package?
Comment 7 Oliver Burger 2011-11-28 09:50:22 CET
x2go needs the nx libraries, so I can't provide x2go without nx, can I?
Comment 8 Marja Van Waes 2012-01-23 07:04:51 CET
Setting version to cauldron to improve the chance that someone will package it. When it is in cauldron, it is expected to be available in the first stable release that follows, but it is also possible to reopen this request for Mga 1, then.

CC: (none) => marja11
Version: 1 => Cauldron
Summary: package request: freenx => freenx, Free NX implementation
Whiteboard: (none) => Mdv

Comment 9 Oliver Burger 2012-01-23 09:03:19 CET
I'm on it but no luck so far on the nx libraries and without them no freenx and no x2goserver.
Comment 10 r howard 2012-03-04 20:35:03 CET
The freenx-server.spec file refers to the source as http://download.berlios.de/freenx/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz  

I did some further research and it appears that with the reorganization of berlios.de the download location of the freenx-server tarball has moved.  

I discovered that berlios.de has moved to using sourceforge for freenx-server and the tarball download location is now at http://sourceforge.net/projects/freenx.berlios/files/freenx-server-0.7.3.tar.gz
I am hoping that If the spec file is updated freenx-server should build

( I think the reason this is not a problem for older rpm based distributions is that they have the tarball cached locally ).

( Note that if you look at the berlios.de  freenx Files page you will see a link to http://prdownload.berlios.de/freenx/freenx-server-0.7.3.tar.gz but that is just a redirect page to the sourceforge page which the build tools cannot follow ).
Comment 11 r howard 2012-03-04 21:03:12 CET
(In reply to comment #10)
> The freenx-server.spec file refers to the source as
should of typed freenx.spec

> http://download.berlios.de/freenx/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz  
> 
> I did some further research and it appears that with the reorganization of
> berlios.de the download location of the freenx-server tarball has moved.  
> 
> I discovered that berlios.de has moved to using sourceforge for freenx-server
> and the tarball download location is now at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freenx.berlios/files/freenx-server-0.7.3.tar.gz
> I am hoping that If the spec file is updated freenx-server should build
> 
> ( I think the reason this is not a problem for older rpm based distributions is
> that they have the tarball cached locally ).
> 
> ( Note that if you look at the berlios.de  freenx Files page you will see a
> link to http://prdownload.berlios.de/freenx/freenx-server-0.7.3.tar.gz but that
> is just a redirect page to the sourceforge page which the build tools cannot
> follow ).
Comment 12 isadora 2012-03-05 16:58:19 CET
Oliver, can this help you out?

https://launchpad.net/freenx-server/trunk

CC: (none) => isis2000

Comment 13 Florian Hubold 2013-01-03 21:20:14 CET
FWIW, the problem seems not the freenx or freenx-server package, it builds just fine, and we also have that tarball cached in version 0.7.3 in our svn repository. The problem is the nx package itself.


@Oliver: Why not try to import the Fedora version of nx libraries, they seem to have the same tarballs which we have, but it seems to build fine for them.

FWIW, nx builds fine from a cauldron checkout under mga2, apart from that i don't know what the problem is. Care to elaborate?

CC: (none) => doktor5000

Comment 14 Philippe Makowski 2015-10-02 16:42:19 CEST
x2goserver is in Mageia shouldn't this bug beeing closed ?

CC: (none) => makowski.mageia

Philippe Makowski 2015-10-02 16:42:32 CEST

CC: makowski.mageia => (none)

Comment 15 pha leon 2016-09-14 14:21:38 CEST
Bug is marked as resolved and can be reopen if needed.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => phaleon
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 16 pha leon 2016-09-14 16:01:32 CEST
Reopening since freenx and x2goserver are two different tools, so the request for integrating freenx is still valid

Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED => (none)

Comment 17 pha leon 2016-09-15 10:43:08 CEST
Assigning this package request to all packagers collectively. On a voluntary basis, one of them might want to integrate it to the distribution and maintain it for bug and security fixes.

Status: REOPENED => ASSIGNED
CC: (none) => pkg-bugs

Comment 18 pha leon 2016-09-15 10:57:01 CEST
You might also want to join the packager team to maintain this piece of software: see https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Becoming_a_Mageia_Packager

Status: ASSIGNED => NEW

pha leon 2016-09-15 11:46:13 CEST

CC: pkg-bugs => (none)
Assignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugs


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.