Current mesa-20.0.1 has some flaws in r300_dri.so driver (see bug #27267) causing crashes on firefox68; Mesa 20.1.x fixes it, among other bugs. However, Mesa 20.1.x series arrived at end of life and upstream adviced to update to 20.2.x series (see https://www.mesa3d.org/news/releases/mesa-20-1-10-is-released/). Here is a list of SRPMS packages required (in building order, actually in updates_testing) for building mesa 20.2.1: SRPMS: - meson-0.52.1-1.mga7.src.rpm - libdrm-2.4.102-1.mga7.src.rpm - mesa-20.2.1-1.mga7.src.rpm and here is the resulting RPMS for i586 and x86_64: i586: drm-utils-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm-common-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm-devel-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm2-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm_amdgpu1-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm_intel1-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm_nouveau2-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdrm_radeon1-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libkms1-2.4.102-1.mga7.i586.rpm libd3d1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libd3d1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libdri-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libgbm1-20.2.1-1.mga..> libgbm1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libgbm1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libglapi0-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libglapi0-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaegl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaegl1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesagl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesagl1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaglesv1_1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaglesv1_1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaglesv2_2-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaglesv2_2-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesakhr-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaopencl-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesaopencl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesavulkan-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libmesavulkan-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libosmesa-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libosmesa8-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libvdpau-driver-nouveau-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libvdpau-driver-r300-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libvdpau-driver-r600-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libvdpau-driver-radeonsi-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libxatracker2-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm libxatracker2-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm mesa-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm mesa-common-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm mesa-omx-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.i586.rpm meson-0.52.1-1.mga7.noarch.rpm x86_64: drm-utils-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm-devel-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm2-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm_amdgpu1-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm_intel1-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm_nouveau2-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64drm_radeon1-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64kms1-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm libdrm-common-2.4.102-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64d3d1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64d3d1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64dri-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64gbm1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64gbm1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64glapi0-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64glapi0-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaegl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaegl1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesagl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesagl1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaglesv1_1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaglesv1_1-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaglesv2_2-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaglesv2_2-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesakhr-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaopencl-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesaopencl1-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesavulkan-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64mesavulkan-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64openswr0-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64osmesa-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64osmesa8-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64vdpau-driver-nouveau-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64vdpau-driver-r300-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64vdpau-driver-r600-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64vdpau-driver-radeonsi-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64xatracker2-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm lib64xatracker2-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm mesa-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm mesa-common-devel-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm mesa-omx-drivers-20.2.1-1.mga7.x86_64.rpm meson-0.52.1-1.mga7.noarch.rpm
Blocks: (none) => 27267
Sorry, updated mesa packages fixes primarily some flaws in r300_dri.so driver for bug 27267. So closing this INVALID. Adding above suggested advisory and packages list. Sending this to QA.
Blocks: 27267 => (none)Resolution: (none) => INVALIDStatus: NEW => RESOLVEDCC: (none) => ouaurelien
Could have used this bug for the update, but that's fine to keep it where it started. Better to mark this as a duplicate rather than invalid though. Thanks Giuseppe! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 27267 ***
CC: (none) => luigiwalserResolution: INVALID => DUPLICATE