Bug 2577 - x86_64 NFS install can't mount the NFS directory
Summary: x86_64 NFS install can't mount the NFS directory
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installer (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thierry Vignaud
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: 5Beta1
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-31 16:47 CEST by Frank Griffin
Modified: 2021-01-12 21:12 CET (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: drakx-installer
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments
report.bug (70.68 KB, application/text-plain)
2011-08-31 17:56 CEST, Frank Griffin
Details

Description Frank Griffin 2011-08-31 16:47:29 CEST
Another MDV legacy.

If you attempt to  do a 64-bit NFS install, pointing the directory to "cauldron", the install program loads and starts successfully.  However, as soon as you get to "Package Group Selection", the install fails, saying "An error occurred; unable to access medium 'Core 32-bit Release'"

Looking in /tmp/media.cfg, Core 32-bit Release is in there with a path of ../../i586/.....  The /tmp/ddebug.log shows "adding medium Core 32-bit Release" with no errors.  The only thing on VT 3 is "urpmi error: unable to access Core 32-bit Release"

I'm not sure what the CWD is when urpmi interprets the above path, but I'm guessing that the path was correct when the media were added, but isn't correct when urpmi tries to use them.

The upshot is that 64-bit NFS installs are impossible.
Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2011-08-31 17:05:40 CEST
can you attach your /root/drakx/report.bug.gz ?

Source RPM: (none) => drakx-installer

Comment 2 Frank Griffin 2011-08-31 17:56:21 CEST
Created attachment 746 [details]
report.bug

Here you go.
Manuel Hiebel 2011-09-27 19:39:02 CEST

Attachment 746 mime type: application/octet-stream => application/text-plain

Manuel Hiebel 2011-09-27 19:43:01 CEST

Assignee: bugsquad => thierry.vignaud

Comment 3 Marja Van Waes 2011-12-31 19:36:45 CET
@ Thierry

another ping, for the same reason

CC: (none) => marja11

Comment 4 Marja Van Waes 2012-04-23 16:52:09 CEST
3-monthly ping
Comment 5 Marja Van Waes 2012-05-26 13:04:46 CEST
Hi,

This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment.

Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2.

Thanks :)

Cheers,
marja

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO

Frank Griffin 2012-06-12 21:33:56 CEST

Whiteboard: (none) => MGA2TOO
Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)

Comment 6 Marja Van Waes 2012-07-06 15:05:45 CEST
Please look at the bottom of this mail to see whether you're the assignee of this  bug, if you don't already know whether you are.


If you're the assignee:

We'd like to know for sure whether this bug was assigned correctly. Please change status to ASSIGNED if it is, or put OK on the whiteboard instead.

If you don't have a clue and don't see a way to find out, then please put NEEDHELP on the whiteboard.

Please assign back to Bug Squad or to the correct person to solve this bug if we were wrong to assign it to you, and explain why.

Thanks :)

**************************** 

@ the reporter and persons in the cc of this bug:

If you have any new information that wasn't given before (like this bug being valid for another version of Mageia, too, or it being solved) please tell us.

@ the reporter of this bug

If you didn't reply yet to a request for more information, please do so within two weeks from now.

Thanks all :-D
Comment 7 Frank Griffin 2014-03-03 18:58:50 CET
Somehow missed the later posts on this.  I'll retest.
Comment 8 David Walser 2014-03-03 21:01:15 CET
I wonder if there's any relationship with Bug 9824.
Comment 9 Frank Griffin 2014-04-01 01:18:08 CEST
Still happening in current cauldron.
Comment 10 Dick Gevers 2014-11-25 12:44:18 CET
Since only current installer can be fixed (5beta1 or higher) and unclear that it applies:
@anyone: please mark whiteboard as '5beta1' (or higher if still valid), wiping NEEDINFO and please change back version to 'Cauldron'.

Otherwise this one should be closed.

Version: Cauldron => 4
Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
Whiteboard: MGA2TOO => MGA4TOO

Comment 11 Frank Griffin 2014-11-25 12:55:09 CET
I'll retest.
Comment 12 Frank Griffin 2014-11-25 13:21:36 CET
NFS installs now crash well before the original error.  After stage 2 gets loaded, you get a "Sending termination signals" and the machine reboots before any diagnostic info can be obtained.  Booting a rescue image via NFS works OK, but no root partition was ever created on the target disk so no trace of the error remains.
Frank Griffin 2014-11-25 13:23:10 CET

Whiteboard: MGA4TOO => 5Beta1
Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)
Version: 4 => Cauldron

Comment 13 Frank Griffin 2019-02-20 00:34:13 CET
I'll retest...
Comment 14 Frank Griffin 2021-01-12 20:53:12 CET
This now fails in a different way.  The stage 1 install now stalls because the exported NFS directory, while correct and correctly mounted from other systems, cannot be found by the installer.  tty3 contains the correct NFS name, but claims that the mount fails with "no such file or directory".  It's trying to mount the NFS directory on /tmp/media, which does not exist.

If I go to tty2 and mkdir /tmp/media, it still fails the same way.  

If I use a FQDN for the NFS host, still fails the same way.

If I use an IP address it claims that the result from mount is "invalid parameter".

Can this please be addressed before 8 freezes ?  This bug is now 10 years old.
Frank Griffin 2021-01-12 21:12:19 CET

Summary: x86_64 NFS install can't find Core 32-bit Release media => x86_64 NFS install can't mount the NFS directory


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.