The following packages have bad signatures: /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64faad2-2.7-6.mga3.tainted.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Fri 11 Jan 2013 03:40:43 PM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66)) /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64lame0-3.99.5-3.mga3.tainted.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Sat 12 Jan 2013 06:38:52 AM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66)) /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64yaml0_2-0.1.4-6.mga3.nonfree.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Thu 17 Jan 2013 08:45:51 PM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66)) Reproducible: Steps to Reproduce:
Priority: Normal => release_blockerBlocks: (none) => 8016
Also showing up for all of the other tainted packages being installed.
from where does they come ?
CC: (none) => pterjan
The signature is correct, the problem is "Medium without key" which I understand to mean that there is no key configured for this media in your urpmi config.
"urpmi.update --force-key 'media name'" should add the key in urpmi config.
CC: (none) => boklm
Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
Closing as invalid. With the patch to have mgaapplet properly enable Nonfree and tainted, the packages are installing ok.
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => INVALID
CC: boklm => (none)