Bug 9883 - Some tainted packages signed with unknown key
Summary: Some tainted packages signed with unknown key
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: BuildSystem (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: release_blocker normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sysadmin Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: NEEDINFO
Depends on:
Blocks: 8016
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-04-27 02:11 CEST by Dave Hodgins
Modified: 2014-05-08 18:04 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: faad2-2.7-6.mga3.tainted.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Dave Hodgins 2013-04-27 02:11:54 CEST
The following packages have bad signatures:                                              
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64faad2-2.7-6.mga3.tainted.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Fri 11 Jan 2013 03:40:43 PM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66))
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64lame0-3.99.5-3.mga3.tainted.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Sat 12 Jan 2013 06:38:52 AM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66))
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64yaml0_2-0.1.4-6.mga3.nonfree.x86_64.rpm: Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Thu 17 Jan 2013 08:45:51 PM EST, Key ID b742fa8b80420f66))


Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Dave Hodgins 2013-04-27 02:12:29 CEST

Priority: Normal => release_blocker
Blocks: (none) => 8016

Comment 1 Dave Hodgins 2013-04-27 02:14:28 CEST
Also showing up for all of the other tainted packages being installed.
Comment 2 Manuel Hiebel 2013-04-27 12:45:59 CEST
from where does they come ?

CC: (none) => pterjan

Comment 3 Pascal Terjan 2013-04-27 12:58:45 CEST
The signature is correct, the problem is "Medium without key" which I understand to mean that there is no key configured for this media in your urpmi config.
Comment 4 Nicolas Vigier 2013-04-27 17:13:18 CEST
"urpmi.update --force-key 'media name'" should add the key in urpmi config.

CC: (none) => boklm

Manuel Hiebel 2013-05-10 22:43:07 CEST

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO

Comment 5 Dave Hodgins 2013-05-11 00:36:40 CEST
Closing as invalid.  With the patch to have mgaapplet
properly enable Nonfree and tainted, the packages are
installing ok.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => INVALID

Nicolas Vigier 2014-05-08 18:04:45 CEST

CC: boklm => (none)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.