Bug 9413 - A name mismatch between libusb1.0 packages and the corresponding devel ones
Summary: A name mismatch between libusb1.0 packages and the corresponding devel ones
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: 2
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sander Lepik
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-15 22:21 CET by Mike Arnautov
Modified: 2013-03-16 20:37 CET (History)
0 users

See Also:
Source RPM: libusb1-1.0.9-1.mga2.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Mike Arnautov 2013-03-15 22:21:55 CET 
Description of problem: The libusb1.0 packages are named lib64usb1.0_0 and libusb1.0_0, while the corresponding devel packages omit the _0 in the name. Their names are lib64usb1.0-devel and libusb1.0 respectively. This create the impression of there not being devel packages for libusb.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.9-1.mga2


How reproducible: 100% :-)


Steps to Reproduce: N/A... see above
1.
2.
3.


Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Manuel Hiebel 2013-03-16 16:08:03 CET

Assignee: bugsquad => sander.lepik
Source RPM: lib64usb1.0_0-1.0.9-1.mga2 and libusb1.0_0-1.0.9-1.mga2 => libusb1-1.0.9-1.mga2.src.rpm

Comment 1 Sander Lepik 2013-03-16 20:37:52 CET 
Sorry, but I'm not going to "fix" it. It's been like that for ages. And -devel package doesn't have to include major in its name.

It's not that hard to run "urpmq -y libusb|grep devel". And it would be bad practice to do changes like that on a stable release.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.