Description of problem: Please add packages for Open Shot 1.4.2 - Video Editor: - libx264 - libxvid - libmp3lame
what is this bug report ? Why do you need these package ?
@ Ronaldo Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply within two weeks from now, I will have to close this bug as OLD. Thank you.
Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFOCC: (none) => marja11Assignee: rochiare => bugsquad
It forgives for the delay friend! I have been very atarefado in the work. These packages are requested when we desire to convert or to export video archive
(In reply to comment #3) > > These packages are requested when we desire to convert or to export video > archive assigning to maintainer @ Damien Please set status to ASSIGNED or put OK on the whiteboard if I assigned correctly
Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)Assignee: bugsquad => mageiaSource RPM: Open Shot 1.4.2 - Video Editor => openshot-1.4.2-1.mga2.src.rpm
A few points: - Openshot uses the python binding of mlt. - libavcodec (core) is a require of mlt (core). - libx264 (tainted), libxvid (tainted), liblame (tainted) need libavcodec (tainted) to work with mlt (core) and openshot (core). So, as packages are in tainted, people need to install them by hand. I can ask a "core" package to pull "tainted" deps.
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => WONTFIX
(In reply to comment #5) > > So, as packages are in tainted, people need to install them by hand. > I can ask a "core" package to pull "tainted" deps. I have a hard time trying to understand what you're saying, but I saw you closed this as wontfix Did you mean: "If I would package them, they would have to go into the tainted repository and then people would need to install them by hand, because I *cannot* ask a core package to pull tainted dependencies. That would lead to a lot of complaints from users, which would give a lot of extra work, so closing as WONTFIX"?
(In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > > > [...] > > Did you mean: > > "If I would package them, they would have to go into the tainted repository and > then people would need to install them by hand, because I *cannot* ask a core > package to pull tainted dependencies. That would lead to a lot of complaints > from users, which would give a lot of extra work, so closing as WONTFIX"? Sorry Marja. :-) Packages are already there, but in "tainted". Openshot and mlt are in "core". So, "mlt" installs "libavcodec" from "core". To work, it needs to have "libavcodec" from "tainted" + "libx264", "liblame", "libxvid" from "tainted" too. A package from "core" cannot pull dependencies from tainted. So, I can't do anything more... It's not that it will lead complaints or extra work: it's just impossible. That's why "wontfix". Better? :-)
(In reply to comment #7) > Sorry Marja. :-) > Packages are already there, but in "tainted". > Openshot and mlt are in "core". So, "mlt" installs "libavcodec" from "core". > To work, it needs to have "libavcodec" from "tainted" + "libx264", "liblame", > "libxvid" from "tainted" too. > > A package from "core" cannot pull dependencies from tainted. So, I can't do > anything more... > > It's not that it will lead complaints or extra work: it's just impossible. > > That's why "wontfix". > > Better? :-) Yes, a lot better, thanks Damien :) Sophie seems to think I treated her badly, she refused to tell me the packages already exist in tainted, even though I asked twice for all three of them :( @ Ronaldo Sophie is a useful chat bot who knows everything about our packages