Bug 54 - Adding 64-bit repositories will not provide 32-bit repo (Main equiv.)
Summary: Adding 64-bit repositories will not provide 32-bit repo (Main equiv.)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Release (media or process) (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Triaged
: 192 606 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-02-16 17:40 CET by Tomas Kindl
Modified: 2011-04-01 11:22 CEST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM:
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Tomas Kindl 2011-02-16 17:40:59 CET 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101230 Mandriva Linux/1.9.2.13-0.2mdv2010.2 (2010.2) Firefox/3.6.13
Build Identifier: 

Description of problem:
When upgrading from MDV 2010.2 on x86_64 platform, no 32-bit repo is added, therefore wine(32) is not available.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. urpmi.removemedia -a 
2. urpmi.addmedia --distrib <mirror>/distrib/cauldron/x86_64
3. urpmi wine


Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Ahmad Samir 2011-02-16 20:03:09 CET 
Yes, that's a known issue, acceptable for now until urpmi/mirrors are fully sorted out.

Assignee: ahmadsamir3891 => bugs
Source RPM: (none) => urpmi

Comment 2 Tomas Kindl 2011-02-16 23:34:52 CET 
It should be added to errata then...
Comment 3 Ahmad Samir 2011-02-21 02:50:44 CET 
Good point, and I see you added it.

Keywords: (none) => Triaged
Assignee: bugs => bugsquad

Comment 4 Ahmad Samir 2011-02-26 16:42:10 CET 
*** Bug 192 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

CC: (none) => davlucas

Comment 5 Thierry Vignaud 2011-03-03 16:38:00 CET 
This is a regression when upgrading a MDV box.

CC: (none) => thierry.vignaud
Source RPM: urpmi => (none)

Comment 6 Jiang Yike 2011-03-05 05:10:05 CET 
Can Wine32 be added to x86_64 mirrors instead of adding an i586 repository? Wine64 can't run through the menu and the command "wine".

CC: (none) => futureway

Comment 7 Ahmad Samir 2011-03-05 19:52:29 CET 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can Wine32 be added to x86_64 mirrors instead of adding an i586 repository?
> Wine64 can't run through the menu and the command "wine".

No, x86_64 won't have i586 packages. The proper fix is that urpmi adds i586 Core Release repo to x86_64 installs by default.
Comment 8 David LUCAS 2011-03-06 00:27:45 CET 
Wine32 can not be compiled for 64 bits cpu, but in the goal to run 32 bits windows apps ?
Comment 9 Jiang Yike 2011-03-06 00:43:19 CET 
Wine64 doesn't work. I added an i586 core repository and installed Wine32. Wine32 works well.
Comment 10 Jiang Yike 2011-03-06 00:46:06 CET 
Wine32 has a bug (Bug 235), because its operating interface can't show Chinese characters in Chinese locale.
Comment 11 D Morgan 2011-03-06 01:19:10 CET 
please don't mix bugreports, here this is just about wine32 on 64bit not about bug 235.

CC: (none) => dmorganec

Comment 12 Jiang Yike 2011-03-06 01:44:39 CET 
(In reply to comment #11)
> please don't mix bugreports, here this is just about wine32 on 64bit not about
> bug 235.

Oh, I see. A bug report is just for a topic. Sorry!
Comment 13 Thomas Backlund 2011-03-13 15:57:10 CET 
Media definitions are now fixed on reference mirror, so it will soon be on a mirror near you.

all 32bit Core medias are now added by default ox x86_64, 
with only core/release and core/updates enabled by default.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => tmb
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 14 Thierry Vignaud 2011-04-01 11:22:24 CEST 
*** Bug 606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

CC: (none) => zen25000
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.