Bug 4830 - Two M2B1 gstreamer rpms have gone missing
Summary: Two M2B1 gstreamer rpms have gone missing
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: i586 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shlomi Fish
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 4948
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-03-06 22:38 CET by William Kenney
Modified: 2012-03-23 14:12 CET (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: gstreamer0.10
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description William Kenney 2012-03-06 22:38:05 CET 
referenced RPM's are no longer in the M2B1 tainted repo.
Are they now redundent and no longer needed or truly lost?

I'm most concerned with the loss of the x264 RPM

Thanks
Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2012-03-06 22:45:11 CET 
Indeed the x86_64 are there but not the i586 one

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
CC: (none) => sysadmin-bugs
Assignee: bugsquad => shlomif
Source RPM: gstreamer0.10-lame.... gstreamer0.10-x264.... => gstreamer0.10

Manuel Hiebel 2012-03-06 22:46:38 CET

Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)

Comment 2 Shlomi Fish 2012-03-09 09:53:20 CET 
Apparently, the x264 RPMs here:

http://mirrors.kernel.org/mageia/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/tainted/release/

Belong to a much older version of the gstreamer packages - 0.10.18. In any case, gst123 can play an H.264 video file fine here (an .flv downloaded from YouTube using youtube-dl),

[root@telaviv1 ~]# rpm -qa '*264*'
lib64x264_120-0.120-0.20120306.stable.1.mga2.tainted
lib64x264-devel-0.120-0.20120306.stable.1.mga2.tainted

And the /proc/$PID/maps for that gives me:

7fab4248f000-7fab4259b000 r-xp 00000000 08:09 1971639                    /usr/lib64/libx264.so.120
7fab4259b000-7fab4279b000 ---p 0010c000 08:09 1971639                    /usr/lib64/libx264.so.120
7fab4279b000-7fab4279d000 r--p 0010c000 08:09 1971639                    /usr/lib64/libx264.so.120
7fab4279d000-7fab4279e000 rw-p 0010e000 08:09 1971639                    /usr/lib64/libx264.so.120

So I suggest removing the out-of-date packages from the x86-64 section, in order to avoid confusion, and this may be indicative of a bug in our infrastructure.

Regards,

-- Shlomi Fish
Comment 3 William Kenney 2012-03-09 16:32:49 CET 
Today I've used both OpenShot and Kino to
work and import/export x264 videos and I
didn't see a problem.

I've been successful to import, edit and
export an MP3 file from Audacity. That
newly created MP3 file was successfully
played by Audacity, Audacious and Rhythmbox.
Maybe LAME is redundant and I should stop
installing it.
Comment 4 Manuel Hiebel 2012-03-09 18:03:36 CET 
Have you seen that we spoke about the i586 arch ?
Comment 5 William Kenney 2012-03-09 18:08:54 CET 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Have you seen that we spoke about the i586 arch ?

Sorry I'm not that technical about that subject.
Explain, thanks.
Manuel Hiebel 2012-03-14 20:52:34 CET

Depends on: (none) => 4948

Comment 6 Dimitri Jakov 2012-03-23 11:55:40 CET 
Packages are there again after rebuild. Enjoy :)

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => mitya
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 7 William Kenney 2012-03-23 14:12:22 CET 
Your the best.

Thanks
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.