Bug 4681 - uninstalling docbook-dtds: Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/catalog
Summary: uninstalling docbook-dtds: Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/catalog
Status: RESOLVED OLD
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: NEEDINFO
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-24 16:22 CET by Kamil Rytarowski
Modified: 2014-04-26 20:56 CEST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: docbook-dtds
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Kamil Rytarowski 2012-02-24 16:22:34 CET 
Description of problem:
There is an error when uninstalling this package:

"Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/catalog"

I have installed Beta1 from boot.iso with a standard installlation and got this error when uninstalling this package as an orphan (after deleting cups).
Manuel Hiebel 2012-02-24 19:45:20 CET

CC: (none) => dmorganec, jani.valimaa
Summary: error message when uninstalling docbook-dtds => uninstalling docbook-dtds: Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/catalog
Source RPM: (none) => docbook-dtds

Jani Välimaa 2012-03-08 21:09:18 CET

CC: jani.valimaa => (none)

Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2012-05-26 13:03:38 CEST 
Hi,

This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment.

Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2.

Thanks :)

Cheers,
marja

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO

Comment 2 Marja Van Waes 2012-07-15 06:36:22 CEST 
@ Kamil

Can this bug be closed as OLD, or did you run into it again with current cauldron and/or Mageia 2?

CC: (none) => marja11

Comment 3 roelof Wobben 2012-12-31 16:06:08 CET 
@ Kamil

Can this bug be closed as OLD, or did you run into it again with current
cauldron and/or Mageia 2?

CC: (none) => r.wobben

Comment 4 Kamil Rytarowski 2013-01-01 01:26:36 CET 
Nothing has changed so far (Mga3), so I assume it's valid.
Comment 5 roelof Wobben 2013-01-01 10:38:39 CET 
Dmorgan , Can you shine a light on this matter.
Comment 6 Marja Van Waes 2014-04-26 20:56:20 CEST 
The reporter agreed on IRC to close this report as OLD

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => OLD
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.