Bug 34337 - Firefox 128.11
Summary: Firefox 128.11
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Security (show other bugs)
Version: 9
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: QA Team
QA Contact: Sec team
URL:
Whiteboard: MGA9-32-OK MGA9-64-OK
Keywords: advisory, validated_update
Depends on: 34384
Blocks: 34338
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2025-06-02 11:09 CEST by Nicolas Salguero
Modified: 2025-06-25 22:45 CEST (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: nss, firefox, firefox-l10n
CVE: CVE-2025-5262, CVE-2025-5263, CVE-2025-5264, CVE-2025-5266, CVE-2025-5267, CVE-2025-5268, CVE-2025-5269
Status comment: Do not ship any firefox packages on armv7hl, but nss is OK

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Nicolas Salguero 2025-06-02 11:09:58 CEST 
Mozilla has released Firefox 128.11 on May 27:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/128.11.0/releasenotes/

Security issues fixed:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-44/

Mozilla has released NSS 3.112 on May 23:
https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/nss_3_112.html
Nicolas Salguero 2025-06-02 11:11:42 CEST

CVE: (none) => CVE-2025-5263, CVE-2025-5264, CVE-2025-5266, CVE-2025-5267, CVE-2025-5268, CVE-2025-5269
Source RPM: (none) => nss, firefox, firefox-l10n
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9TOO

Nicolas Salguero 2025-06-02 11:13:21 CEST

Blocks: (none) => 34338

Nicolas Salguero 2025-06-02 11:14:01 CEST

CVE: CVE-2025-5263, CVE-2025-5264, CVE-2025-5266, CVE-2025-5267, CVE-2025-5268, CVE-2025-5269 => CVE-2025-5262, CVE-2025-5263, CVE-2025-5264, CVE-2025-5266, CVE-2025-5267, CVE-2025-5268, CVE-2025-5269

Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2025-06-05 21:17:30 CEST 
Assigning to the de facto maintainer

Assignee: bugsquad => nicolas.salguero
CC: (none) => marja11

Comment 2 Nicolas Salguero 2025-06-10 09:38:43 CEST 
Version 128.11.0 fails to build for i586 for Mageia 9, probably because of the timeout, and I have no idea why it takes so long.

Assignee: nicolas.salguero => pkg-bugs

Comment 3 Michael Martins 2025-06-19 01:57:36 CEST 
Does it still give an error when compiling?

CC: (none) => michael.xgrind

Comment 4 katnatek 2025-06-19 02:56:58 CEST 
(In reply to Michael Martins from comment #3)
> Does it still give an error when compiling?

Yes and if my last try fails I'll suggest to release just for x86_64 and aarch64
until we can find what happen, one of my guess is the last update of nodejs bug#34278
Comment 5 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-19 18:20:55 CEST 
I think we should for now skip this for the failing architecture(s) in order to get the security update to most users. Both FF and TB is widely in use.

Then immediately keep trying fixing the problem for next version.

CC: (none) => fri

katnatek 2025-06-19 18:59:57 CEST

Depends on: (none) => 34384

Comment 6 katnatek 2025-06-20 00:00:41 CEST Comment hidden (obsolete)

Version: Cauldron => 9
Assignee: pkg-bugs => qa-bugs
Whiteboard: MGA9TOO => (none)
Hardware: All => x86_64

Comment 7 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-20 10:26:32 CEST 
(In reply to katnatek from comment #6)
> The nss packages should be tested with current firefox for i586 ti see if
> not produce unwanted side effect

On x86_64, i7 870 CPU, Plasma X11 I have been running them with previous FF and TB since jun 4, no problem noted.

Yes they should be tested on i586 with current FF as we now for i586 release nss but not FF nor TB.

Status comment: (none) => Remember in i586 to test nss

Comment 8 Herman Viaene 2025-06-20 11:08:27 CEST 
MGA9-64 server Plasma Wayland on Compaq H000SB
No installation issues.
Nespaper, youtube, bank account, all work OK.

CC: (none) => herman.viaene

Comment 9 Jose Manuel López 2025-06-20 11:38:03 CEST 
Hi,

Updated in real Mga x64 Plasma installation. I'm using it right now without issues.

Audio and video in Youtube ok.
Settigns ok.
Addons ok.
Spanish translation ok.
Digital certificates ok.
Bookmarks ok.
Banks ok.

Greetings!

CC: (none) => Joselp

Comment 10 Thomas Andrews 2025-06-21 14:43:28 CEST 
MGA9-64 Plasma on an HP Pavilion 15. Checked tracking on a package, Facebook, two weather forecasts, long range weather forecasts (continued warmer and wetter than normal. Sigh.), downloaded a copy of today's newspaper, and this report.

No issues so far.

CC: (none) => andrewsfarm

Comment 11 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-21 23:04:26 CEST 
mga9-64 OK here on Plasma, X11

Clean update
Swedish localisation
Tabs restored
Settings kept
Various shopping sites, banking sites
Video sites
Downloading
Printing web page
Open local pdf

[morgan@svarten ~]$ inxi -SCG
System:
  Host: svarten.tribun Kernel: 6.6.93-desktop-1.mga9 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
  Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.27.10 Distro: Mageia 9
CPU:
  Info: quad core model: Intel Core i7 870 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
    L2: 1024 KiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 1205 min/max: 1200/2934 cores: 1: 1205 2: 1205 3: 1205
    4: 1205 5: 1205 6: 1205 7: 1205 8: 1205
Graphics:
  Device-1: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] Navi 24 [Radeon RX 6400/6500
    XT/6500M] driver: amdgpu v: kernel
  Display: x11 server: X.org v: 1.21.1.8 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 driver: X:
    loaded: amdgpu,v4l dri: radeonsi gpu: amdgpu resolution: 3840x2160~60Hz
  API: EGL v: 1.5 drivers: kms_swrast,radeonsi,swrast
    platforms: gbm,x11,surfaceless,device
  API: OpenGL v: 4.6 vendor: amd mesa v: 25.0.6 renderer: AMD Radeon RX
    6400 (radeonsi navi24 LLVM 15.0.6 DRM 3.54 6.6.93-desktop-1.mga9)
Comment 12 Brian Rockwell 2025-06-22 05:02:27 CEST 
MGA9-64, Plasma

The following 6 packages are going to be installed:

- firefox-128.11.0-1.mga9.x86_64
- firefox-en_CA-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- firefox-en_GB-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- firefox-en_US-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- lib64nss3-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64
- nss-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64

71KB of disk space will be freed.


-- rebooted

used for several hours across many websites. 

Working as expected.

CC: (none) => brtians1

Comment 13 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-22 19:13:09 CEST 
MGA9 - i586 nss OK with our current Mozilla Firefox 128.10.1esr


Surfed around a bit, listened to pod, watched a video (not up to speed, slow drivers, years since it worked on this machine)


---


Note:

We must avoid to ship the i586 firefox 128.11 internationalisation packages currently in i586 updates testing repo !

Status comment: Remember in i586 to test nss => Do not ship any firefox packages on i586, but nss is OK

Comment 14 katnatek 2025-06-22 19:46:52 CEST 
I have progress in bug#34384, I'll send the build and make other test before send new firefox & thunderbird builds
Comment 15 Len Lawrence 2025-06-22 20:05:11 CEST 
mga9, x64
Firefox running fine here on Mate.
8-core AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with Radeon Graphics
Realtek RTL8153 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter driver: r8152
32 GB RAM

CC: (none) => tarazed25

Comment 16 katnatek 2025-06-24 03:47:34 CEST 
firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9 is building now, will see the result
Comment 17 katnatek 2025-06-24 05:06:40 CEST 
(In reply to katnatek from comment #16)
> firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9 is building now, will see the result

Bad news have issues in armv7hl :(
Comment 18 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-24 05:58:58 CEST 
I think we should release the x86_64 we have, now.
Comment 19 katnatek 2025-06-24 06:15:20 CEST 
(In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #18)
> I think we should release the x86_64 we have, now.

Could be too late, I don't know how the BS works in these cases, but the build is finished for i586 and x86_64, aarch64 still building
Comment 20 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-24 06:32:32 CEST 
Ah I was too tired, thought it also meant i586 did not get built.

OK lets QA firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9 in both i586 & x86_64 then :-)
when available.

For x86_64 now i assume we can now do minimal tests.
Comment 21 katnatek 2025-06-24 06:51:17 CEST 
RPMS:

firefox-af-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-an-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ar-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ast-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-az-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-be-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-bg-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-bn-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-br-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-bs-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ca-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-cs-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-cy-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-da-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-de-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-el-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-en_CA-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-en_GB-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-en_US-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-eo-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-es_AR-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-es_CL-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-es_ES-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-es_MX-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-et-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-eu-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-fa-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ff-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-fi-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-fr-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-fur-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-fy_NL-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ga_IE-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-gd-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-gl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-gu_IN-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-he-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-hi_IN-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-hr-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-hsb-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-hu-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-hy_AM-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ia-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-id-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-is-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-it-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ja-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ka-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-kab-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-kk-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-km-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-kn-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ko-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-lij-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-lt-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-lv-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-mk-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-mr-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ms-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-my-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-nb_NO-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-nl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-nn_NO-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-oc-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-pa_IN-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-pl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-pt_BR-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-pt_PT-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ro-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ru-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sc-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-si-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sk-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sq-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sr-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-sv_SE-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-szl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ta-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-te-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-tg-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-th-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-tl-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-tr-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-uk-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-ur-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-uz-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-vi-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-xh-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-zh_CN-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
firefox-zh_TW-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm

firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9

lib(64)nss-devel-3.112.0-1.mga9
lib(64)nss-static-devel-3.112.0-1.mga9
lib(64)nss3-3.112.0-1.mga9
nss-3.112.0-1.mga9
nss-doc-3.112.0-1.mga9

SRPMS:
firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9
firefox-l10n-128.11.0-1.mga9
nss-3.112.0-1.mga9

Hardware: x86_64 => All
Status comment: Do not ship any firefox packages on i586, but nss is OK => Do not ship any firefox packages on armv7hl, but nss is OK

Comment 22 Brian Rockwell 2025-06-24 14:36:41 CEST 
MGA9-64, Xfce, core i7 M620, Nvidia GT218M (nouveau) 

The following 5 packages are going to be installed:

- firefox-128.11.0-1.mga9.x86_64
- firefox-en_CA-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- firefox-en_GB-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- firefox-en_US-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
- lib64nss3-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64

--- rebooted

spending a few hours using it.  No issues
Comment 23 katnatek 2025-06-24 14:49:35 CEST 
(In reply to Brian Rockwell from comment #22)
> MGA9-64, Xfce, core i7 M620, Nvidia GT218M (nouveau) 
> 
> The following 5 packages are going to be installed:
> 
> - firefox-128.11.0-1.mga9.x86_64
> - firefox-en_CA-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
> - firefox-en_GB-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
> - firefox-en_US-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch
> - lib64nss3-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64
> 
> --- rebooted
> 
> spending a few hours using it.  No issues

The binary package should be
firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9
Comment 24 katnatek 2025-06-24 17:48:55 CEST 
RH x86_64

installing lib64nss3-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64.rpm nss-3.112.0-1.mga9.x86_64.rpm from //home/katnatek/qa-testing/x86_64
Preparing...                     ##################################################################################################
      1/2: nss                   ##################################################################################################
      2/2: lib64nss3             ##################################################################################################
      1/2: removing lib64nss3-2:3.111.0-1.mga9.x86_64
                                 ##################################################################################################
      2/2: removing nss-2:3.111.0-1.mga9.x86_64
                                 ##################################################################################################

LC_ALL=C urpmi firefox
In order to satisfy the 'firefox-l10n' dependency, one of the following packages is needed:
 1- firefox-es_AR-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Argentina) interface for Firefox (to install)
 2- firefox-es_CL-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Chile) interface for Firefox (to install)
 3- firefox-es_ES-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish interface for Firefox (to install)
 4- firefox-es_MX-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Mexico) interface for Firefox (to install)
 5- firefox-en_CA-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: Canadian English interface for Firefox (to install)
 6- firefox-en_GB-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: British English interface for Firefox (to install)
 7- firefox-en_US-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: English (United States) interface for Firefox (to install)
What is your choice? (1-7) 4
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
  Package                        Version      Release       Arch    
(medium "QA Testing (64-bit)")
  firefox                        128.11.0     1.1.mga9      x86_64  
  firefox-es_MX                  128.11.0     1.mga9        noarch  (recommended)
223MB of additional disk space will be used.
68MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) y


installing firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9.x86_64.rpm firefox-es_MX-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm from //home/katnatek/qa-testing/x86_64
Preparing...                     ##################################################################################################
      1/2: firefox-es_MX         ##################################################################################################
      2/2: firefox               ##################################################################################################

Webcam in zoom test page OK
Youtube OK
mail.com
Post this comment

We must hurry up the test , Mozilla release 128.12.0
Comment 25 katnatek 2025-06-24 18:26:14 CEST 
RH i586

installing nss-3.112.0-1.mga9.i586.rpm libnss3-3.112.0-1.mga9.i586.rpm from //home/katnatek/qa-testing/i586
Preparing...                     #######################################################################################
      1/2: nss                   #######################################################################################
      2/2: libnss3               #######################################################################################
      1/2: removing nss-2:3.111.0-1.mga9.i586
                                 #######################################################################################
      2/2: removing libnss3-2:3.111.0-1.mga9.i586
                                 #######################################################################################

LC_ALL=C urpmi firefox
In order to satisfy the 'firefox-l10n' dependency, one of the following packages is needed:
 1- firefox-es_AR-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Argentina) interface for Firefox (to install)
 2- firefox-es_CL-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Chile) interface for Firefox (to install)
 3- firefox-es_ES-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish interface for Firefox (to install)
 4- firefox-es_MX-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch: Spanish (Mexico) interface for Firefox (to install)
 5- firefox-af-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: Afrikaans interface for Firefox (to install)
 6- firefox-en_CA-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: Canadian English interface for Firefox (to install)
 7- firefox-en_GB-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: British English interface for Firefox (to install)
 8- firefox-en_US-128.10.1-1.mga9.noarch: English (United States) interface for Firefox (to install)
What is your choice? (1-8) 4
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
  Package                        Version      Release       Arch    
(medium "QA Testing (32-bit)")
  firefox                        128.11.0     1.1.mga9      i586    
  firefox-es_MX                  128.11.0     1.mga9        noarch  (recommended)
264MB of additional disk space will be used.
67MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) y


installing firefox-es_MX-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm firefox-128.11.0-1.1.mga9.i586.rpm from //home/katnatek/qa-testing/i586
Preparing...                     #######################################################################################
      1/2: firefox               #######################################################################################
      2/2: firefox-es_MX         #######################################################################################

Webcam in zoom test page OK
Youtube OK
Post this comment
katnatek 2025-06-24 19:35:35 CEST

Keywords: (none) => advisory

Comment 26 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-25 00:56:09 CEST 
OK i586 on Thinkpad T43, lxde, Intel Pentium M, ATI Radeon X300

Used two banking websites, listened to pod, weather forecast, writing this.

---

OK x86_64: browsed around on my workstation, Nextcloud & Syncthing web interfaces, some webshops, weather forecast...
Comment 27 Thomas Andrews 2025-06-25 14:26:44 CEST 
MGA9-64 Plasma. No installation issues, and seems to be working OK here. Thunderbird OK, as well.

In light of the release of a new Firefox, and several successful tests, giving this OKs and validating. Katnatek, if I am still premature, please make the necessary changes.

Keywords: (none) => validated_update
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9-32-OK MGA9-64-OK
CC: (none) => sysadmin-bugs

Comment 28 Brian Rockwell 2025-06-25 15:24:35 CEST 
MGA9-64

added the decimal version of firefox and used it for a number of hours.  no issues
Comment 29 Mageia Robot 2025-06-25 17:15:37 CEST 
An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository.

https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2025-0195.html

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

katnatek 2025-06-25 17:52:21 CEST

CC: (none) => dan

Comment 30 katnatek 2025-06-25 17:53:37 CEST 
Dan I just want to confirm that you not move the lang packages here and thunderbird to armv7hl
Comment 31 Dan Fandrich 2025-06-25 18:32:18 CEST 
I didn't do anything special for this move; if the packages were built, they were moved. If there are special requirements, they need to be clear in the last couple of comments. I only this very moment noticed the "Status comment" field, which I didn't realize was being used for this purpose. I'll keep and eye on that field in the future if you'll be using it.

I'll go ahead and "undo" the armv7hl moves of firefox and firefox-l10n packages.

Resolution: FIXED => (none)
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED

Comment 32 Dan Fandrich 2025-06-25 18:43:46 CEST 
Turns out there weren't any armv7hl firefox packages to move (I guess the issues in comment #17 were build issues and not testing issues) so all is well.

Resolution: (none) => FIXED
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED

Comment 33 katnatek 2025-06-25 18:50:18 CEST 
(In reply to Dan Fandrich from comment #32)
> Turns out there weren't any armv7hl firefox packages to move (I guess the
> issues in comment #17 were build issues and not testing issues) so all is
> well.

Not even the firefox-*-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm

Thank you
Comment 34 katnatek 2025-06-25 19:09:11 CEST 
https://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mageia/distrib/9/armv7hl/media/core/updates/firefox-af-128.11.0-1.mga9.noarch.rpm and others

This can break firefox for armvthl users?

Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED => (none)

Comment 35 Morgan Leijström 2025-06-25 21:08:39 CEST 
I think the only thing that will happen is that the updater finds them and then complain to the user that there is no suitable update.

That was the status on i586 firefox before you compiled it.

So only nagging, the internationalisation packages will not be installed unless forced.  Users will ask, but there are not many armv7 users, and probably thye understand what it is about.

It would have been many more user asking if the problem was on i586.

So, IMO, just let this rest, and issue will be solved when ff will again build on all arches.
Comment 36 katnatek 2025-06-25 21:23:09 CEST 
Thomas if you are OK with comment 35, I'll close this again
Comment 37 Dan Fandrich 2025-06-25 21:43:39 CEST 
I didn't notice that the firefox and firefox-l10n packages are different versions. I've moved the armv7hl packages back to updates_testing and am rebuilding the hdlists now.
Comment 38 Dan Fandrich 2025-06-25 22:15:07 CEST 
The arm packages are now back out of updates.

Resolution: (none) => FIXED
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED

Comment 39 Thomas Andrews 2025-06-25 22:45:53 CEST 
(In reply to katnatek from comment #36)
> Thomas if you are OK with comment 35, I'll close this again

I'm OK with it, and I see Dan has already taken care of it.

Let's all hope this gets resolved with the next FF update...
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.