Bug 33608 - Thunderbird 128.3.2 for arches other than x86_64
Summary: Thunderbird 128.3.2 for arches other than x86_64
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 33633
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Security (show other bugs)
Version: 9
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nicolas Salguero
QA Contact: Sec team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 33322 33501 33502 33633
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2024-10-04 08:44 CEST by Nicolas Salguero
Modified: 2024-10-22 09:50 CEST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: thunderbird
CVE: CVE-2024-7519, CVE-2024-7520, CVE-2024-7521, CVE-2024-7522, CVE-2024-7524, CVE-2024-7525, CVE-2024-7526, CVE-2024-7527, CVE-2024-7528, CVE-2024-7529, CVE-2024-7531, CVE-2024-8385, CVE-2024-8381, CVE-2024-8382, CVE-2024-8383, CVE-2024-8384, CVE-2024-8386, CVE-2024-8387
Status comment:


Attachments

Comment 1 Lewis Smith 2024-10-04 21:23:57 CEST
I thought every update was automatically done for all architectures.
Leaving this with NicolasS as you normally update Thunderbird. If you do not want it, please re-assign to pkg-bugs.
I see that you have already updated Cauldron to version 128.3.0, so this is for M9.

Assignee: bugsquad => nicolas.salguero

Nicolas Salguero 2024-10-08 13:45:05 CEST

Source RPM: thunderbird, thunderbird-l10n => thunderbird

Nicolas Salguero 2024-10-11 09:24:47 CEST

Summary: Thunderbird 128.3 for arches other than x86_64 => Thunderbird 128.3.1 for arches other than x86_64

Nicolas Salguero 2024-10-11 09:25:02 CEST

Depends on: (none) => 33633

Nicolas Salguero 2024-10-21 16:26:58 CEST

Summary: Thunderbird 128.3.1 for arches other than x86_64 => Thunderbird 128.3.2 for arches other than x86_64

Comment 2 katnatek 2024-10-21 19:39:32 CEST
I wonder if now that llvm17 is ready we can merge again this bug with bug#33633 ?
Comment 3 Nicolas Salguero 2024-10-22 09:50:40 CEST
(In reply to katnatek from comment #2)
> I wonder if now that llvm17 is ready we can merge again this bug with
> bug#33633 ?

Yes, I agree with you.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33633 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.