Created attachment 14493 [details] patch for llvm spec file Description of problem: Trying to install some mesa/graphics 32 bit, I run into conflicting llvm-plugins-17.0 packages, i.e. 32bit/64bit packages with the same name. It looks like a typo in the spec file. I think that this %{_isa} tag shouldn't be present here: Requires: llvm-plugins%{?_isa} >= %{version}-%{release} Steps to Reproduce: 1. 64bit system with lib64llvm17.0-17.0.6 installed $rpm -qa --last | grep lib64llvm | cut -d' ' -f1 lib64llvm17.0-17.0.6-6.mga10.x86_64 2. try to install libllvm17.0 $sudo urpmi libllvm17.0 --test A requested package cannot be installed: libllvm17.0-17.0.6-6.mga10.i586 (due to unsatisfied llvm-plugins-17.0.6-6.mga10.i586) Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) n How reproducible: always Attached is a patch of the spec file for easier reading. Regards.
Thank you for the report and your correction. Assigning to wally who is the main committer for LLVM.
Assignee: bugsquad => jani.valimaa
(In reply to Aurelian R from comment #0) > It looks like a typo in the spec file. I think that this %{_isa} tag > shouldn't be present here: > Requires: llvm-plugins%{?_isa} >= %{version}-%{release} One other option is to keep the %{?_isa} tag but use "Recommends:" instead of a hard "Requires:" which also allows "libllvm17.0" to be installed along a 64-bit "llvm-plugins" package. Anyhow, I finally managed to locally rebuild llvm for each option and both options seem to work fine for me, but I'm not sure which one is the sensible choice.
Great, fixed by version llvm-17.0.6-7.mga10
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => FIXED