Description of problem: this openCPN plugin has been improved since opencpn-8.2.4 was packaged this new version is updates_testing Updated package in /core/updates_testings ========================================= opencpn-ais-radar-plugin-1.4.10.0-1.mga9 for each arch from SRPM opencpn-ais-radar-plugin-1.4.10.0-1.mga9.src.rpm This package needs to be tested on the opencpn version from core/updates (opencpn-5.8.4-2)
Typo : you may read This package needs to be tested on the opencpn version from core/release (opencpn-5.8.4-2) instead of This package needs to be tested on the opencpn version from core/updates (opencpn-5.8.4-2)
O.T. It was really necessary one report for each new opencpn package? Why not just one report to rule them all?
If you, Philippe, could give a pointer to testing it... But thanks yet again for your sterling work on this application.
Assignee: bugsquad => qa-bugs
to test it you simply have to verify that the update is done without any problem Then click on its icon inside the icons bar a little window appear but no object can be detected inside the radar circle if your computer is not linked to an ais receptor
Blocks: (none) => 32742
Advisory from comment 0 added to SVN. Please remove the "advisory" keyword if it needs to be changed. It also helps when obsolete advisories are tagged as "obsolete"
CC: (none) => marja11Keywords: (none) => advisory
Mageia9, x86_64 This is the only architecture available here. Installed current opencpn and updated the radar plugin. Configured opencpn with State of California maps for part of the west coast of the USA. Enabled radar, two types of scanners, and the icon duly appeared in the task bar. Clicking on that created two square panels which reported failure to find any radar source, as expected. Looks like the plugin works anyway. Giving this an OK. Next step is to see if the advisory needs to be modified in any way - en train.
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9-64-OKCC: (none) => tarazed25
Nope, although there is information on the web regarding opencpn radar plugins I could not see anything to enlarge the Description section so this goes to commit.
Sorry for the newbie questions - have never dealt with real advisories before. Is 'bugfix' the correct type? Would 'enhancement' be preferable? Otherwise I cannot see the need for any change.
(In reply to Len Lawrence from comment #8) > Sorry for the newbie questions - have never dealt with real advisories > before. > Is 'bugfix' the correct type? Would 'enhancement' be preferable? Otherwise > I cannot see the need for any change. Yes. The advisories being committed to svn can only have security or bugfix as the the "type".
CC: (none) => davidwhodgins
Validating.
Keywords: (none) => validated_updateCC: (none) => andrewsfarm, sysadmin-bugs
An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2024-0013.html
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => FIXED