Description of problem: kalk-23.04.1-1.mga9 only shows an empty window due to the not existing QtFeedback 5 package in Mageia. Steps to Reproduce: 1.install and start kalk 2.See empty app window and terminal output Terminal output: [plasma@test ~]$ kalk kf.kirigami: (qrc:/qml/CalculationPage.qml:343:21: Type NumberPad unavailable NumberPad { ^, qrc:/qml/NumberPad.qml:14:5: Type PortraitPad unavailable PortraitPad { ^, qrc:/qml/PortraitPad.qml:17:5: Type NumberButton unavailable NumberButton {text: "√(" ; display: "√"; onClicked: pressed(text);} ^, qrc:/qml/NumberButton.qml:14:1: module "QtFeedback" is not installed import QtFeedback 5.0 ^) [plasma@test ~]$
URL: (none) => https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kalk/-/tree/v24.01.80?ref_type=tags#dependencies
URL: https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kalk/-/tree/v24.01.80?ref_type=tags#dependencies => https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kalk/-/tree/release/23.04?ref_type=heads#dependencies
I cannot find any package which corresponds: $ urpmq -y feedback kuserfeedback lib64kuserfeedback-devel lib64kuserfeedbackcore1 lib64kuserfeedbackwidgets1 mariadb-feedback Trying Feedback yielded nothing. Nor did: $ urpmf qtfeedback $ urpmf qtfeedback5 $ urpmf QtFeedback $ urpmf QtFeedback5 So do we know what package is missing?
CC: (none) => lewyssmithSource RPM: (none) => kalk-23.04.1-1.mga9.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1217957#c1
This is also my bug on openSUSE. There the maintainers patched out the QtFeedback requirement…
Should be fixed in next kalk-23.04.1-1.1.mga9 update! Assigning to QA, Packages in 9/Core/Updates_testing: ====================== kalk-23.04.1-1.1.mga9 From SRPMS: kalk-23.04.1-1.1.mga9.src.rpm
CC: (none) => geiger.david68210Assignee: bugsquad => qa-bugs
kalk-23.04.1-1.1.mga9 works MGA9 64bit OK
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9-64-OK
Advisory with SRPM from comment 4 added to SVN. Please remove the "advisory" keyword if it needs to be changed. It also helps when obsolete advisories are tagged as "obsolete"
CC: (none) => marja11Keywords: (none) => advisory
Mga9 x64 working......also x86 working in virtualbox install, installed from testing packages needed....
Keywords: advisory => (none)
(In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #6) > Advisory with SRPM from comment 4 added to SVN. Please remove the "advisory" > keyword if it needs to be changed. It also helps when obsolete advisories > are tagged as "obsolete" You mean remove this advisory from keyword? i removed it?
(In reply to Otto Leipälä from comment #8) > (In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #6) > > Advisory with SRPM from comment 4 added to SVN. Please remove the "advisory" > > keyword if it needs to be changed. It also helps when obsolete advisories > > are tagged as "obsolete" > > You mean remove this advisory from keyword? i removed it? When the advisory needs to be changed, then remove the "advisory" keyword. Does anything need to be changed in the advisory? You can see the current version here: https://svnweb.mageia.org/advisories/32617.adv?revision=15394&view=markup Tell me if something is wrong with it. If it is good as it is, then please add the advisory keyword back.
(In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #9) > (In reply to Otto Leipälä from comment #8) > > > > You mean remove this advisory from keyword? i removed it? You did indeed remove it
Keywords: (none) => advisory
(In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #9) > (In reply to Otto Leipälä from comment #8) > > (In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #6) > > > Advisory with SRPM from comment 4 added to SVN. Please remove the "advisory" > > > keyword if it needs to be changed. It also helps when obsolete advisories > > > are tagged as "obsolete" > > > > You mean remove this advisory from keyword? i removed it? > > When the advisory needs to be changed, then remove the "advisory" keyword. > > Does anything need to be changed in the advisory? You can see the current > version here: > https://svnweb.mageia.org/advisories/32617.adv?revision=15394&view=markup > > Tell me if something is wrong with it. If it is good as it is, then please > add the advisory keyword back. Hups sorry i did understand this bit wrong sorry....
(In reply to Otto Leipälä from comment #11) > > Hups sorry i did understand this bit wrong sorry.... No problem ;-)
Validating.
Keywords: (none) => validated_updateCC: (none) => andrewsfarm, sysadmin-bugs
An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2023-0151.html
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => FIXED