Bug 32470 - Update python3-sphinx to 7.1.2
Summary: Update python3-sphinx to 7.1.2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New RPM package request (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-10-31 09:28 CET by Kristoffer Grundström
Modified: 2023-10-31 17:49 CET (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: python3-sphinx
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Proposal spec (11.36 KB, text/plain)
2023-10-31 09:28 CET, Kristoffer Grundström 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Kristoffer Grundström 2023-10-31 09:28:04 CET 
Description of problem: I took the liberty of packaging an update for python3-sphinx which also come with a dummy package needed by xmlada-2023.0.0 once it's being built. Feel free to adapt it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 7.1.2
Comment 1 Kristoffer Grundström 2023-10-31 09:28:30 CET 
Created attachment 14120 [details]
Proposal spec

CC: (none) => lovaren

Comment 2 Kristoffer Grundström 2023-10-31 09:29:42 CET 
Here are the created packages for it:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/umeaman/python3-sphinx/build/6584055/
Comment 3 Marja Van Waes 2023-10-31 12:55:42 CET 
We do already have python-sphinx-7.2.5-2.mga10.src.rpm in cauldron, so do have 
python3-sphinx-7.2.5-2.mga10.rpm

I assume that is fine? If not, we don't do downgrades.

CC: (none) => marja11
Resolution: (none) => FIXED
Status: NEW => RESOLVED

Comment 4 Kristoffer Grundström 2023-10-31 14:08:37 CET 
Well, that's fine, but we're still missing the dummy package that comes with it though.
Comment 5 papoteur 2023-10-31 17:49:24 CET 
(In reply to Kristoffer Grundström from comment #4)
> Well, that's fine, but we're still missing the dummy package that comes with
> it though.

What means "dummy package for it"?
Know that Mageia isn't Fedora. In particular, Mageia didn't split tex style in a myriad of package, thus the Requires in your spec file aren't OK for Mageia.

CC: (none) => yvesbrungard
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.