Bug 32137 - fsarchiver update for EXT4 orphan_file feature
Summary: fsarchiver update for EXT4 orphan_file feature
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 32136
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David GEIGER
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: MGA9TOO
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-07-24 22:22 CEST by Morgan Leijström
Modified: 2023-07-25 10:28 CEST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: fsarchiver-0.8.6-2.mga9.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Morgan Leijström 2023-07-24 22:22:33 CEST 
From bug 31071#c34

__Description of problem:
Our version 0.8.6. do not support the EXT4 orphan_file feature, which several currrent distros use - And probably a future Mageia - mga9 did for a period during cauldron.


fsarchiver supports EXT4 orphan_file since 0.8.7 [1].

The support can be patched also to 0.8.6. -If there is any reason not to update? 

[1] https://github.com/fdupoux/fsarchiver/commit/478fa089521b76064d006dd7241dd0b1dc28d0d8
Comment 1 Morgan Leijström 2023-07-24 22:28:01 CEST 
Assigning to registered maintainer
cc Jani from referenced bug

Note qt-fsarchiver bundles its own copy of fsarchiver, but even so requires fsarchiver, strange, bit for fsarchiver package i think we should not care about that.

CC: (none) => jani.valimaa
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9TOO
Assignee: bugsquad => geiger.david68210

Comment 2 sturmvogel 2023-07-25 06:32:16 CEST 
Why two bugs for the same topic? Isn't this a dup of bug 32136 ?
Comment 3 Jani Välimaa 2023-07-25 08:56:36 CEST 
Duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 32136 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE

Comment 4 Morgan Leijström 2023-07-25 10:21:53 CEST 
(In reply to sturmvogel from comment #2)
> Why two bugs for the same topic? Isn't this a dup of bug 32136 ?

Because fsarchiver-qt seem to be hard to maintain and use a bundled fsarchiver anyway (and dep on fsarchiver package probably removed), I was thinking we should separate the two so fsarchiver could be updated using this bug.
Comment 5 Morgan Leijström 2023-07-25 10:28:10 CEST 
OOPs *that bug* I did not see, numbered just before this
Same track then :)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.