Bug 31694 - MGA9: old package - openjfx 11.0.9 (mga8), is now 11.0.19
Summary: MGA9: old package - openjfx 11.0.9 (mga8), is now 11.0.19
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: All Packagers
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-03-17 13:41 CET by psyca
Modified: 2023-06-07 14:21 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: openjfx-11.0.9.2-3.mga8.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description psyca 2023-03-17 13:41:01 CET 
Description of problem:
We have an old version of openjfx-11.0.9.2-3 with MGA8 in the name.
The current version is 11.0.19. Maybe to proof if it can get updated.

Just a note:
We also have openjfx8-8.0.202-25.b07.2.mga8.src.rpm but it looks like there are no updates since 2020 anymore.
Comment 1 Lewis Smith 2023-03-21 09:55:57 CET 
We should not launch Mageia 9 with packages we know are significantly outdated.
This one has different committers, so assigning this globally.

(In reply to psyca from comment #0)
> We also have openjfx8-8.0.202-25.b07.2.mga8.src.rpm but it looks like there
> are no updates since 2020 anymore.
Is this a candidate to drop?

Assignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugs
Summary: MGA9: old package - openjfx 11 => MGA9: old package - openjfx 11.0.9 (mga8), is now 11.0.19
CC: (none) => lewyssmith

Comment 2 Nicolas Salguero 2023-03-21 10:19:51 CET 
Hi,

Because eclipse was removed from Cauldron, openjfx and openjfx8 cannot be built anymore.  I think the best thing to do is to drop both.

Best regards,

Nico.

CC: (none) => nicolas.salguero

Comment 3 psyca 2023-05-02 05:00:52 CEST 
Any news about removing them?
Morgan Leijström 2023-05-03 10:02:07 CEST

Blocks: (none) => 30163

Comment 4 Nicolas Salguero 2023-06-07 14:21:23 CEST 
Hi,

Finally, no need to remove them.  I was able to build openjfx8 and openjfx (17.0.0.1) without SWT.

Best regards,

Nico.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Blocks: 30163 => (none)
Resolution: (none) => FIXED
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.