Bug 30159 - configure packagekit to update packages via dnf.
Summary: configure packagekit to update packages via dnf.
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL: https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2022-...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-03-12 12:04 CET by Nikolay Sabelnikov
Modified: 2022-03-17 05:50 CET (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: mgaonline-3.31-2.mga9.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Nikolay Sabelnikov 2022-03-12 12:04:03 CET 
is it possible to add dns support to mgaapplet? if possible, configure it to update packages whose reps do not support urpm
Comment 1 sturmvogel 2022-03-12 12:14:04 CET 
Added link to dev ML discussion
Set version to cauldron as it is an enhancement

As it was already mentioned at dev ML, dnfdragora and it's applet serves dnf.

URL: (none) => https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2022-02/msg00172.html
Version: 8 => Cauldron

sturmvogel 2022-03-12 12:18:57 CET

Source RPM: mgaapplet => mgaonline-3.31-2.mga9.src.rpm

Comment 2 Lewis Smith 2022-03-13 08:49:33 CET 
This looks like an unnecessary complication, given:
> dnfdragora and it's applet serves dnf
And as Nikolay himself has already suggested in another bug, if you want to have "packages whose reps do not support urpm", use DNF for those only, and rpm for the rest. That way they should not conflict.

CC'ing MagieaTools for comment, but I think we should close this bug. The requirement looks complicated; but may not be.

CC: (none) => lewyssmith, mageiatools

Comment 3 Nikolay Sabelnikov 2022-03-16 16:27:56 CET 
if you use, purely dnf, then there is no need for urpmi.
Comment 4 sturmvogel 2022-03-16 17:55:16 CET 
As you were already told in an other ML thread, it is not planned to move away from urpm. There is no reason for it.
Comment 5 Lewis Smith 2022-03-16 21:04:03 CET 
(In reply to Nikolay Sabelnikov from comment #3)
> if you use, purely dnf, then there is no need for urpmi.
Nor mgaapplet?
I think this can be closed as being too esoteric, especially in the light of:
> dnfdragora and it's applet serves dnf

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => INVALID

Comment 6 Nikolay Sabelnikov 2022-03-17 00:14:20 CET 
then you can try to configure packagekit to update packages using dnf, with rep incompatible with urpm.

Summary: add dnf mgaapplet support => configure packagekit to update packages via dnf.
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID => (none)

Comment 7 sturmvogel 2022-03-17 05:49:52 CET 
Please don't reopen bugs whitout valid reasons!

(In reply to Lewis Smith from comment #5)
> .....especially in the light of:
> > dnfdragora and it's applet serves dnf

(In reply to sturmvogel from comment #4)
> it is not planned to move away from urpm. There is no reason for it.
Comment 8 sturmvogel 2022-03-17 05:50:13 CET 
...

Resolution: (none) => INVALID
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.