Bug 29758 - Update LXQt to 1.0.0 release
Summary: Update LXQt to 1.0.0 release
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David GEIGER
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: MGA8TOO
Keywords:
: 30607 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-12-11 11:50 CET by papoteur
Modified: 2023-04-13 14:54 CEST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM:
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments
Spec files for 1.0.0 release (70.00 KB, application/x-tar)
2021-12-11 11:54 CET, papoteur
Details
Diff of spec files (40.00 KB, application/x-tar)
2021-12-11 12:28 CET, papoteur
Details
Second run, spec files diff (40.00 KB, application/x-tar)
2021-12-11 15:09 CET, papoteur
Details
Third run, diff of spec files (40.00 KB, application/x-tar)
2021-12-11 19:18 CET, papoteur
Details

Description papoteur 2021-12-11 11:50:42 CET
LXQt has released 1.0.0
https://lxqt-project.org/release/2021/11/06/lxqt-1-0-0/
It has to be updated in Cauldron.
Comment 1 papoteur 2021-12-11 11:54:07 CET Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 papoteur 2021-12-11 12:28:54 CET Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 3 papoteur 2021-12-11 15:09:27 CET Comment hidden (obsolete)

Attachment 13040 is obsolete: 0 => 1
Attachment 13041 is obsolete: 0 => 1

Comment 4 papoteur 2021-12-11 19:18:32 CET
Created attachment 13044 [details]
Third run, diff of spec files

I have build the whole set of rpm then installed. I'm running the LXQt 1.0.0 session.

Attachment 13043 is obsolete: 0 => 1

Comment 5 Lewis Smith 2021-12-11 20:44:52 CET
Thank you both for the alert, and the work you have done on the spec files. There are a lot of SRPMs...

lxqt-about
lxqt-admin
lxqt-appswitcher
lxqt-archiver
lxqt-build-tools
lxqt-common
lxqt-config
lxqt-config-randr
lxqt-globalkeys
lxqt-l10n
lxqt-notificationd
lxqt-openssh-askpass
lxqt-panel
lxqt-policykit
lxqt-powermanagement
lxqt-qtplugin
lxqt-runner doktor5000
lxqt-session
lxqt-sudo
lxqt-theme-artemis
lxqt-themes
lxqt-wallet

Florian is the main person listed, CC'ing; DavidG is more evident for updates, so assigning to you. I imagine you can solicit help if necessary.

CC: (none) => doktor5000
Assignee: bugsquad => geiger.david68210

Comment 6 Nicolas Lécureuil 2021-12-12 09:57:28 CET
upload in progress

CC: (none) => mageia

Comment 7 Nicolas Lécureuil 2021-12-13 09:14:45 CET
Please test :-) 

All is in updates_testing.

Status: NEW => NEEDINFO

Comment 8 papoteur 2022-01-02 15:44:42 CET
Hi Nicolas,
I installed LXQt 1.0.0 from updates_testing in my cauldron VM. I didn't see any problem for installation nor in running it.
I opened all configuration tools, pcmanfm-qt, lximage-qt and screengraber.
Comment 9 Morgan Leijström 2022-01-02 21:13:31 CET
Great :)

Is this something to consider for mga8?

Any uppgrade issues to consider?

CC: (none) => fri

Comment 10 papoteur 2022-01-12 15:13:55 CET
(In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #9)
> Great :)
> 
> Is this something to consider for mga8?
> 
> Any upgrade issues to consider?

Hello.
I think it would fix bug 27378 and bug 29223.
We can push LXQt 1.0.0 to backports_testing to investigate further.

Status: NEEDINFO => ASSIGNED

Comment 11 Morgan Leijström 2022-01-12 15:35:14 CET
Backport would be wonderful.
I will test it on mga8 64 bit (at least)

Whiteboard: (none) => MGA8TOO

Comment 12 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2022-04-18 08:14:09 CEST
LXQt 1.1.0 has been released
https://lxqt-project.org/release/2022/04/15/lxqt-1-1-0/

However this package needs KF5 5.78 (we have 5.76 in mga8)

CC: (none) => dglent

Comment 13 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2022-04-18 20:45:48 CEST
i built it with KF5 5.76in mga8 and is ok (Firefox opens the lxqt file dialogue)
The dependancy was only for https://github.com/lxqt/xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt
Comment 14 sturmvogel 2022-07-05 07:24:06 CEST
*** Bug 30607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

CC: (none) => epp

Comment 15 papoteur 2022-07-05 09:43:22 CEST
Nicolas,
Do you mean to transfer 1.1.0 from Testing to Core?
Comment 16 sturmvogel 2022-07-05 12:18:46 CEST
I didn't test the Lxqt stuff myself. But if i read all the comments in this bug and see how much work you have done on this i would suggest following:

1.1.0 ist in cauldron core-updates_testing. I would suggest to move it to core, as already some test were done and we can't destroy anything (because cauldron is intented for testing and expected to break at some point). It won't hurt...

If everything works fine (and epp aka Edward testet additionally on his cauldron VM), we can consider to backport 1.1.0 to MGA based on your comment 10.

But this decisions lays with our packagers (es example you). Additionally we can ask at the dev ML if other devs agree or if anything speaks against this...
Comment 17 sturmvogel 2022-07-05 12:20:03 CEST
(In reply to sturmvogel from comment #16)
> and see how much work you have done on this...

Not to forget what Nicolas has done on this...
Comment 18 papoteur 2022-07-05 12:28:15 CEST
It wouldn't hurt me to have it in backports of Mageia 8, except that we have a bug in rpmdrake which install rpm from backports even when backports isn't enabled.
Comment 19 sturmvogel 2022-07-05 12:32:28 CEST
yeah, this ugly one...
Comment 20 papoteur 2023-04-13 14:54:11 CEST
LXQt is up to date in cauldron.
I don't consider we will update Mageia 8 at this time.
Closing
Comment 21 papoteur 2023-04-13 14:54:34 CEST
Really closing

Status: ASSIGNED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.