As it says. A UEFI install from the same ISO on the same machine works fine.
Hi, Can you provide the path to ISO that do that?
Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFOCC: (none) => ouaurelien
Also, Frank, ca
CC: (none) => lewyssmith
[Interrupted by a spurious keystroke...] Frank, please say something about the system. It looks to be an EFI/GPT one: "A UEFI install from the same ISO on the same machine works fine" If so, what is the problem? Are you messing with an MBR disc (EFI/MBR)? If so, why? Or worse, using some MBR/BIOS compatability mode. These are never good ideas.
New Beta 2 iso were released on 2020-Dec-08. Should this be tested with updated one? Again, if this reproduce, please attach here the output from a working Linux OS of the following command as user: $ inxi -F > ./system-info.txt
Sorry, this fell through the cracks. I've been doing a lot of reinstalls lately and I can't be sure exactly which machine was involved. IIRC it was an Asus which recognized that the MGA netinstall disk could go as either UEFI or non-UEFI. I'll close this as INVALID, and reopen it with a (much) better description if I run into it again. The latest machine I'm installing won't even use a non-UEFI boot.
(In reply to Frank Griffin from comment #5) > Sorry, this fell through the cracks. I've been doing a lot of reinstalls > lately and I can't be sure exactly which machine was involved. IIRC it was > an Asus which recognized that the MGA netinstall disk could go as either > UEFI or non-UEFI. > > I'll close this as INVALID, and reopen it with a (much) better description > if I run into it again. The latest machine I'm installing won't even use a > non-UEFI boot. Please do ;) Thanks for feedback. Feel free to reopen if any new details.
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => INVALIDKeywords: NEEDINFO => (none)