https://madb.mageia.org/package/show/source/1/application/0/release/cauldron/name/olive The screenshots are showing ROXTerm instead of Olive Video Editor Maintainer: ghibo
CC: (none) => ghibomgx
Assigning to the registered maintainer!
Assignee: bugsquad => ghibomgxCC: (none) => geiger.david68210
Actually maintainer can't do much as the screenshot is shown in third party web page, even though the url has mageia.org.
Hmmm..,which 3rd party web page is it referencing ? I see the link to https://www.olivevideoeditor.org/ on the package page and i see no trace of the ROXTerm images in said webpage
I meant the whole madb site. It's third party even though it's accessible via mageia.org address. Also the screenshots are from sources out of our hands. Footer says "Screenshots from http://screenshots.debian.net".
Sorry, but i'm thoroughly confused as to how madb works.
We take screenshots from Debian, where "olive" used to be a console RSS reader: http://screenshots.debian.net/packages?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=olive http://screenshots.debian.net/package/olive (The summary is wrong, but the description is about the old olive package.) olive was removed from recent Debian releases, and the video editor is called "olive-editor": https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=olive @ Samuel: Do we have a way to add aliases for screenshot lookup in madb?
Assignee: ghibomgx => stormi-mageiaVersion: Cauldron => trunkProduct: Mageia => WebsitesComponent: RPM Packages => Other
(In reply to Rémi Verschelde from comment #6) > We take screenshots from Debian, where "olive" used to be a console RSS > reader: > > http://screenshots.debian.net/packages?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=olive > http://screenshots.debian.net/package/olive > > (The summary is wrong, but the description is about the old olive package.) > > olive was removed from recent Debian releases, and the video editor is > called "olive-editor": https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=olive > > @ Samuel: Do we have a way to add aliases for screenshot lookup in madb? I had planned it but I don't think I've implemented it.
that makes sense now, thanks for the explanation
any progress, it's a little confusing for users