Bug 24220 - fb2 associations and icons
Summary: fb2 associations and icons
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: All Packagers
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-01-22 02:10 CET by Alex Loginov
Modified: 2019-02-05 14:48 CET (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM:
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Alex Loginov 2019-01-22 02:10:15 CET
Description of problem:

1. Missing icons in default theme:
application-x-fictionbook+xml.svg
application-x-fictionbook.svg
and for archived fb2 books.

2. fb2.zip must be open by reader, but not by archiver.
Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2019-01-22 15:37:02 CET
(In reply to Alex Loginov from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> 1. Missing icons in default theme:
> application-x-fictionbook+xml.svg
> application-x-fictionbook.svg
> and for archived fb2 books.

Which default theme? From your Desktop environment? 
Which desktop environment do you use? 

> 
> 2. fb2.zip must be open by reader, but not by archiver.

Which reader can open fb2.zip files? coolreader3? fbreader? calibre?
Does it work better with a different DE and its default file manager?

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO
CC: (none) => cjw, marja11, smelror

Comment 2 Alex Loginov 2019-01-24 07:47:44 CET
> Which default theme? From your Desktop environment?
Which desktop environment do you use?

Default KDE.

urpmf fictionbook+xml
Theese icons are present in elementary-icon-theme theme only.

urpmf compressed-fb2
No icons. But other distros have theme with theese icons.

> Which reader can open fb2.zip files? coolreader3? fbreader? calibre?

All of them.

> Does it work better with a different DE and its default file manager?

Same with LXDE.

coolreader3, fbreader at this moment have association with "application-x-fictionbook+xml" and "application/x-zip-compressed-fb2"
Marja Van Waes 2019-01-26 19:03:30 CET

Keywords: NEEDINFO => (none)

Comment 3 Marja Van Waes 2019-02-05 14:48:29 CET
This report seems to be about multiple issues, but I know too little about packaging to understand how many times this report should be cloned and to which packages (and their maintainers) this and the resulting report(s) should be assigned.

Therefore assigning to all packagers collectively.

Assignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugs


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.