The "drakrpm" program crashed. Drakbug-17.98 caught it. mcc -> Installer et désinstaller des logiciels detecting looping forever while trying to resolve dependencies. Aborting... Try again with '-vv --debug' options at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Resolve.pm line 1287. Perl's trace: drakbug::bug_handler() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Resolve.pm:1287 URPM::resolve_requested__no_recommends_() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Resolve.pm:1169 URPM::resolve_requested__no_recommends() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Resolve.pm:1099 URPM::resolve_requested() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/urpm/select.pm:403 urpm::select::_resolve_priority_upgrades() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.2/urpm/select.pm:391 urpm::select::resolve_priority_upgrades_after_auto_select() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.22.3/Rpmdrake/pkg.pm:393 Rpmdrake::pkg::get_updates_list() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.22.3/Rpmdrake/pkg.pm:509 Rpmdrake::pkg::get_pkgs() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.22.3/Rpmdrake/gui.pm:642 Rpmdrake::gui::pkgs_provider() called from /usr/libexec/drakrpm:816 main::__ANON__() called from /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.22.3/rpmdrake.pm:415 rpmdrake::slow_func() called from /usr/libexec/drakrpm:816 main::run_treeview_dialog() called from /usr/libexec/drakrpm:859 Theme name: Human Kernel version = 4.17.8-desktop-2.mga7 Distribution=Mageia release 7 (Cauldron) for x86_64 CPU=Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz
*** Bug 23378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I really thought there was an older bug with the same error message, but I can't find it.
Assignee: bugsquad => mageiatoolsSource RPM: (none) => rpmdrakeCC: (none) => marja11, thierry.vignaudSummary: drakrpm crashed => drakrpm crashed (detecting looping forever while trying to resolve dependencies.)
(In reply to Marja Van Waes from comment #2) > I really thought there was an older bug with the same error message, but I > can't find it. There was, bug 22042, but it has "dependancies" instead of "dependencies"... Is that American English versus British English (or the other way around)?? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22042 ***
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => DUPLICATE