Bug 22947 - packagekit new security issue CVE-2018-1106
Summary: packagekit new security issue CVE-2018-1106
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Security (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thierry Vignaud
QA Contact: Sec team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-04-23 23:10 CEST by David Walser
Modified: 2018-07-04 18:44 CEST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: packagekit-1.1.9-1.mga7.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description David Walser 2018-04-23 23:10:02 CEST
SUSE has issued an advisory today (April 23):
https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-04/msg00064.html

I'm not 100% clear on what our exposure to this is, but much detail is in the SUSE bug:
https://bugzilla.suse.com/1086936

Mageia 6 is also potentially affected.
Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2018-04-24 06:41:10 CEST
Assigning to the registered maintainer, CC'ing two recent committers.

Assignee: bugsquad => thierry.vignaud
CC: (none) => marja11, ngompa13, smelror

Comment 2 Marja Van Waes 2018-04-24 06:58:32 CEST
This bug report was discussed in #mageia-dev last night, the conclusion was that we're not vulnerable.

I don't think Neal and David will mind if I C&P those comments:

2018:04:23:23:10 < Luigi12_work> Pharaoh_Atem: what's your opinion on this?  https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22947
<snip> 
2018:04:23:23:16 < Pharaoh_Atem> according to hughsie, dnf was not vulnerable: 
https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/commit/7e8a7905ea9abbd1f384f05f36a4458682cd4697
<snip>
2018:04:23:23:18 < Pharaoh_Atem> if we still had the urpmi backend enabled in Mageia 6 or Cauldron, this would be a problem
2018:04:23:23:18 < Pharaoh_Atem> but we don't, so it turns out to not matter
2018:04:23:23:19 < Luigi12_work> Pharaoh_Atem: so it sounds like we're OK.  Would you mind making that statement on the bug and closing it as INVALID?  Since you're the expert on this stuff, would carry more weight.
2018:04:23:23:19 < Pharaoh_Atem> yeah
2018:04:23:23:19 < Pharaoh_Atem> as soon as I can actually log into mgabz :/

Closing.

Resolution: (none) => INVALID
Status: NEW => RESOLVED

Comment 3 David Walser 2018-04-24 22:27:23 CEST
RedHat has issued an advisory for this today (April 24):
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1224

I guess it's because they're using yum and not dnf.
Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2018-04-25 04:51:06 CEST
Yeah, Red Hat had the PackageKit-Hif backend for a while as an option, but removed it. Both Hif and DNF backends were not vulnerable, but every other backend is.
Comment 5 David Walser 2018-04-28 12:08:19 CEST
Fedora has issued an advisory for this on April 27:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LVDLEEAY64RYVJIR4LIWUYZ2564A345V/

I thought they weren't affected?
Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2018-07-04 18:44:04 CEST
They weren't, but PackageKit 1.1.10 was released, so they did it anyway.

In any case, this doesn't affect us.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.