Description of problem: mga6 ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/tcsh/FAQ': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/tcsh/Fixes': Permission denied Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ls -l /usr/share/doc/tcsh Workaround: chmod +x /usr/share/doc/tcsh
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA6TOOSource RPM: (none) => tcsh-6.19.00-5.mga6.src.rpm
Summary: tcsh-6.19.00-5.mga6.src.rpm => ls -l /usr/share/doc/tcsh : Permission denied
Confirming the issue: [marja@localhost ~]$ ls -al /usr/share/doc | grep "drw-r--r--" | grep "root root" drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 okt 29 2016 abattis-cantarell-fonts/ drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 okt 29 2016 bobobot/ drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 okt 29 2016 cdparanoia/ drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 dec 3 2016 dmsetup/ drw-r--r-- 8 root root 4096 jan 1 2017 fortune-mod/ drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 dec 3 2016 lvm2/ drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 okt 29 2016 stix-fonts/ ===> drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 dec 6 2016 tcsh/ <=== [marja@localhost ~]$ Assigning to all packagers collectively, since there is no registered maintainer for this package. CC'ing some committers
CC: (none) => cjw, luigiwalser, mageia, marja11, tmbAssignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugsEver confirmed: 0 => 1Status: UNCONFIRMED => NEW
Fixed in cauldron. Should we do an update for mga6? This looks like a minor problem since all important information for users is in the man page (which works fine).
Assignee: pkg-bugs => cjwStatus: NEW => ASSIGNED
Meh, just commit the fix to mga6 svn and it will go out _if_ there is some important fix/security issue later
Fix committed in svn. Closing this bug as WONTFIX since the problem won't be solved unless tcsh is updated for some other reason.
Whiteboard: MGA6TOO => (none)Version: Cauldron => 6Status: ASSIGNED => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => WONTFIX
(In reply to Christiaan Welvaart from comment #4) > Fix committed in svn. Closing this bug as WONTFIX since the problem won't be > solved unless tcsh is updated for some other reason. WONTFIX looks wrong to me. FIXED seems more appropriate.
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #5) > (In reply to Christiaan Welvaart from comment #4) > > Fix committed in svn. Closing this bug as WONTFIX since the problem won't be > > solved unless tcsh is updated for some other reason. > > WONTFIX looks wrong to me. FIXED seems more appropriate. I would agree. If change is committed in svn it is fixed. Actual delivery to end users is a different matter.
Well, it's FIXED for Cauldron and (probably) WONTFIX for 6, but usually in these cases we go with the former for bug status.
Resolution: WONTFIX => FIXEDVersion: 6 => Cauldron