Bug 20390 - selection failed: postgresql9.5-devel-9.5.5-2.mga6.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied lib64pq5
Summary: selection failed: postgresql9.5-devel-9.5.5-2.mga6.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 20266
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: All Linux
Priority: release_blocker major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: All Packagers
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: 6sta2
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-03-03 11:59 CET by Bit Twister
Modified: 2017-03-05 18:11 CET (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: postgresql9.5-devel-9.5.5-2.mga6.x86_64
CVE:
Status comment:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Bit Twister 2017-03-03 11:59:31 CET 
Description of problem: 6_s2

ERROR: selection failed:
postgresql9.5-devel-9.5.5-2.mga6.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied lib64pq5[== 9.5.5-2.mga6])

ddebug.log found at    https://bugs.mageia.org/attachment.cgi?id=9015

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. clean install Mageia-6-sta2-x86_64-DVD.iso Tue Feb 28 22:03:40 CET 2017
   with non-free enabled.
3. Pick Custom package install
4. in Package Group Selection screen set all package groups selected except
   Other Graphical Desktops. In that one select Gnome, Xfce and Plasma
5. after boot
6. grep unsatisfied /root/drakx/ddebug.log
Bit Twister 2017-03-03 11:59:45 CET

Keywords: (none) => 6sta2

Comment 1 Rémi Verschelde 2017-03-03 13:44:35 CET 
Bug 20385 likely has the same cause as this one.

We need to finish removing postgresql9.5, joequant introduced 9.6 but did not finish the work, so now stuff is broken.

Priority: Normal => release_blocker
CC: (none) => joequant
Assignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugs
Severity: normal => major

Rémi Verschelde 2017-03-03 13:45:11 CET

See Also: (none) => https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20385

Comment 2 Frédéric "LpSolit" Buclin 2017-03-05 17:38:27 CET 
Duplicate of bug 20266?
Comment 3 David GEIGER 2017-03-05 17:53:21 CET 
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #2)
> Duplicate of bug 20266?

yes this come from postgresql9.6

CC: (none) => geiger.david68210

Comment 4 Frédéric "LpSolit" Buclin 2017-03-05 18:11:10 CET 
Let's close this one, then. We don't need two bugs for the same issue.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20266 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.