Hi team Mageia, Is it possible to package the Vivaldi Browser ? You have sources here https://vivaldi.com/source/ Thanks
CC: (none) => email
(In reply to Adrien D from comment #0) > Hi team Mageia, > Is it possible to package the Vivaldi Browser ? > You have sources here https://vivaldi.com/source/ > Thanks Yeah, that's the beauty with open source code that has the right license form. You're free to build it locally and then add the spec-file to this bugreport. Read these pages to start learning how to create a package for testing purposes before it's released: https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging_for_beginners https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Becoming_a_Mageia_Packager https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packagers_RPM_tutorial
CC: (none) => hamnisdude
Summary: Vivaldi => Vivaldi browser - as Opera should've been
If I ask for this package it is for a packager to do it, not me!
(In reply to Adrien D from comment #2) > If I ask for this package it is for a packager to do it, not me! I know, but we don't have that many packagers to package every request so I just suggested that you'd package it and apply to become its maintainer. Chill, man! Chill. :)
.
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => WONTFIX
You're overstepping your role Kristoffer, you should not talk like that to bug reporters. If you want to help with the bug triage effort, that's great, but please get a mentor (see #mageia-bugsquad) to learn how to handle them.
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENEDResolution: WONTFIX => (none)
Assigning to all packagers collectively. Note about licensing: Vivaldi is a priorietary freeware with open source components. It could probably be packaged in nonfree just like Opera was, though.
Assignee: bugsquad => pkg-bugsSummary: Vivaldi browser - as Opera should've been => vivaldi, freeware browser with open source components (chromium-based)
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => WONTFIX
(In reply to Adrien D from comment #7) > . Add a meaningful comment next time please.
For the record, the bug report has been closed as WONTFIX by the bug reporter himself, not Mageia packagers.
(In reply to Adrien D from comment #7) > . (In reply to Samuel Verschelde from comment #8) > (In reply to Adrien D from comment #7) > > . > > Add a meaningful comment next time please. There are no packagers and I don't want to be a packager for this "useless" software
There are packagers but they can't package everything indeed. What makes you so upset about it? You'd like us to prioritize bug reports in a different way?
(In reply to Samuel Verschelde from comment #11) > There are packagers but they can't package everything indeed. What makes you > so upset about it? You'd like us to prioritize bug reports in a different > way? Also, note that Kristoffer is not a packager either.