Description of problem: Looking for new scanner ends with a segfault form a terminal but doesn't create a message error when used from the MCC. scanimage -L ends with a segfault SANE_DEBUG_DLL=128 scanimage -L ends with libsane-canon.so.1 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.22-1.mga1 How reproducible: every time scanimage -L is launched Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. The Segfault is happening when scanimage looks for a canon scanner, so removing âall the related libs solved the problem : /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon.so.1 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon.so.1.0.22 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon630u.so.1 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon630u.so.1.0.22 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_dr.so.1 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_dr.so.1.0.22 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_pp.so.1 /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_pp.so.1.0.22 scanimage -L now detects correctly my scanner : device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Logitech QuickCam Zoom virtual device device `net:192.168.2.2:hpaio:/usb/Officejet_J4500_series?serial=CN97TC92RM052T' is a Hewlett-Packard Officejet_J4500_series all-in-one
Tomas, can you help on this one ?
CC: (none) => stormi, supp
Source RPM: lib64sane1 => sane
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > Looking for new scanner ends with a segfault form a terminal but doesn't create > a message error when used from the MCC. > scanimage -L ends with a segfault > > SANE_DEBUG_DLL=128 scanimage -L ends with libsane-canon.so.1 > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > 1.0.22-1.mga1 > > How reproducible: > every time scanimage -L is launched > > > The Segfault is happening when scanimage looks for a canon scanner, so removing > âall the related libs solved the problem : > > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon.so.1 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon.so.1.0.22 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon630u.so.1 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon630u.so.1.0.22 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_dr.so.1 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_dr.so.1.0.22 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_pp.so.1 > /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-canon_pp.so.1.0.22 > > scanimage -L now detects correctly my scanner : > > device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Logitech QuickCam Zoom virtual device > device > `net:192.168.2.2:hpaio:/usb/Officejet_J4500_series?serial=CN97TC92RM052T' is a > Hewlett-Packard Officejet_J4500_series all-in-one @ Florian cc'ing you because this report might contain useful information and because I don't know what to do with this bug: The reporter found a workaround. So I'll leave that to you to decice :D
CC: (none) => doktor5000, marja11
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > Looking for new scanner ends with a segfault form a terminal but doesn't create > a message error when used from the MCC. > scanimage -L ends with a segfault Please check https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Debugging_software_crashes You need to provide a backtrace for the segfault, so in short you need to move the removed files back and then follow the instructions given in the wiki page.
Created attachment 1322 [details] backtrace of scanimage -L scanner FS4000 off
Created attachment 1323 [details] backtrace scanimage -L scanner FS4000 powered
I noticed that the problem occurs only when my SCSI scanner Canon FS4000US is connected and powered. Attached the results of the backtrace with an without the scanner powered.
@ JeanMarc Thanks for providing the backtrace assigning to maintainer
Assignee: bugsquad => dmorganec
@ JeanMarc Sorry, our maintainer was too busy I hope Mageia 2 solved the issue for you.... did it?
(In reply to comment #8) > @ JeanMarc > > Sorry, our maintainer was too busy > > I hope Mageia 2 solved the issue for you.... did it? The problem is still there but a "solution" is to remove /usr/lib64/libsane-canon.so.1.0.22. There is some sort of conflict when using this scanner maybe because its a scsi scanner or because it is not properly recognized. Once the lib is removed evrything works well as I use Vuescan to scan my films and slides. Regards Jean-Marc
Per last comment i'd say closing it as the reporter has a workaround and nobody else reported this.
Resolution: (none) => WORKSFORMEStatus: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => pikachu17997