Bug 18706 - Sugar desktop: black
Summary: Sugar desktop: black
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: 9
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal major
Target Milestone: Mageia 10
Assignee: QA Team
QA Contact:
URL: http://sugarlabs.org/
Whiteboard: MGA8TOO, MGA9-64-OK MGA8-64-OK
Keywords: IN_ERRATA9, advisory, validated_update
Depends on:
Blocks: 32127
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-06-14 14:40 CEST by Morgan Leijström
Modified: 2023-10-31 10:01 CET (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: task-sugar-0.120-1.mga9.noarch
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments
part of output of "journalctl -ab"; log begin at user log in (14.03 KB, text/plain)
2016-06-14 16:58 CEST, Morgan Leijström
Details

Description Morgan Leijström 2016-06-14 14:40:21 CEST
I installed task- sugar and dependencies, rebooted
I selected it at login, but the only thing that happens is that mouse pointer change to a large arrow, on top of the (image of the) login screen.

I was just curious to try it, and have not tried anything to get it to work.
Not important for me but I can try something if someone want to debug.
Comment 1 Morgan Leijström 2016-06-14 16:58:13 CEST
Created attachment 7991 [details]
part of output of "journalctl -ab"; log begin at user log in
Marja Van Waes 2016-06-16 20:07:46 CEST

CC: (none) => marja11
Assignee: bugsquad => lists.jjorge

Comment 2 Morgan Leijström 2016-07-12 00:13:20 CEST
I see it got updated but still same result here on all of three tested installs on 64 bit cauldron machines where other DE work:
§ i7n workstation with ati proprietary driver, updated from mga5
§ Centrino vPro Nvidia Quadro laptop with Nvidia driver, updated from mga5
§ Centrino Duo laptop with ati GPU using xorg vesa, fresh install 6_d1+updates

Is it really correct that sugar-base is version 0.98.0-7.mga6, while all other parts seem to be version 0.108.1-3.mga6 ?

Is it working for most installs and I am just unlucky?

If broken for most, IMO we can not ship it in mga6.

I set it to release blocker to get it investigated.

Severity: major => critical
Source RPM: task-sugar 0.107.0-1.mga6 => sugar 0.108.1-3.mga6
Priority: Normal => release_blocker

Comment 3 Marja Van Waes 2016-07-12 13:29:47 CEST
(In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #2)
> I see it got updated but still same result here on all of three tested
> installs on 64 bit cauldron machines where other DE work:
> § i7n workstation with ati proprietary driver, updated from mga5
> § Centrino vPro Nvidia Quadro laptop with Nvidia driver, updated from mga5
> § Centrino Duo laptop with ati GPU using xorg vesa, fresh install
> 6_d1+updates
> 
> Is it really correct that sugar-base is version 0.98.0-7.mga6, while all
> other parts seem to be version 0.108.1-3.mga6 ?


CC'ing daviddavid, who packaged it
> 
> Is it working for most installs and I am just unlucky?
> 
> If broken for most, IMO we can not ship it in mga6.
> 
> I set it to release blocker to get it investigated.

Blocks: (none) => 15527
CC: (none) => geiger.david68210

Comment 4 Manuel Hiebel 2016-07-13 22:45:40 CEST
as this isn't in a iso media (and if it is, why ?), I don't see how it could be release blocker
Comment 5 Marja Van Waes 2016-07-13 23:02:08 CEST
(In reply to Manuel Hiebel from comment #4)
> as this isn't in a iso media (and if it is, why ?), I don't see how it could
> be release blocker

You're right, Manuel, it's not on an iso, thanks :-)

Priority: release_blocker => Normal

Marja Van Waes 2016-07-13 23:02:18 CEST

Blocks: 15527 => (none)

Comment 6 Morgan Leijström 2016-07-14 08:40:06 CEST
Ah. Thanks for the correction on release blocker.
Comment 7 Morgan Leijström 2017-01-04 12:11:01 CET
According to Bug 1969 sugar was working in mga4.
I have no idea if it was working in mga5.
Comment 8 Aurelien Oudelet 2020-09-09 21:39:40 CEST
Hi, thanks for reporting this bug.
We are sorry, but we no longer maintains this version of Mageia. Please upgrade to the latest version and reopen this bug against that version if this bug exists there.
As a result we are setting this bug to RESOLVED:OLD

CC: (none) => ouaurelien
Resolution: (none) => OLD
Status: NEW => RESOLVED

Comment 9 Morgan Leijström 2020-09-10 00:00:54 CEST
Tried now on mga7, an install which have not had this installed before:
Installed task-sugar, rebooted, at login selected Sugar;

Then there are four questions each asked in centre of screen in full screen mode.

It asks for name, i accepted mine.  But the questions of selecting colour, sex, and age can not be answered because the big mouse cursor only works to click the next and continue buttons at left and right screen bottom.  To be more precise there is not even any visible alternative to click except for the age question.

So the bug may be it is unable to present click-able alternatives?  A missing dep?

And i can not go further because at question of age the next button is greyed.

Only exit i found was to kill X; Ctrl+Alt+ twice backspace, and i find myself in login manager.

Tested with login managers SDDM and GDM, same result.


IMO this should finally get fixed, or dropped.

Resolution: OLD => (none)
URL: (none) => http://sugarlabs.org/
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Target Milestone: --- => Mageia 8
Source RPM: sugar 0.108.1-3.mga6 => task-sugar-0.112-3.mga7.noarch.rpm
Version: Cauldron => 7
Severity: critical => major

Comment 10 Nicolas Nicolas 2020-09-20 16:00:20 CEST
Hello,

To be able to have the icons when launching sugar (from Plasma but after from SDDM), i had to install the package python2-gi-cairo as it is a python2 application (at least in the packaged version).

In Cauldron, the version is 0.116 (is this version support python3 ?).

CC: (none) => joe_c_moi

Nicolas Nicolas 2020-09-20 16:00:32 CEST

CC: joe_c_moi => (none)

Comment 11 Morgan Leijström 2020-09-20 23:40:30 CEST
Ah, thank you Nicolas, now it works!

So the depencency python2-gi-cairo should get added to task-sugar, or maybe better sugar-base 


Alternatively drop sugar desktop, because from this bug it seems it is not much used in Mageia...

Summary: Sugar desktop: fail logging in => Sugar desktop: missing dependency
Assignee: lists.jjorge => pkg-bugs
Status comment: (none) => See comment 10

Comment 12 Aurelien Oudelet 2020-09-21 09:50:11 CEST
I think we should drop it or look if upstream has released sources against Python3, not Python2, which we want to be dropped.
Comment 13 Morgan Leijström 2020-09-21 10:18:20 CEST
Yes sugar version on Cauldron seem to be 0.116-2, while task-sugar is 0.112-5

Ported to Python3
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/805
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/issues/787

"Either it builds or gets nuked"
https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2020-09/msg00261.html

Whiteboard: (none) => MGA7TOO
Status comment: See comment 10 => Solution or drop it. see comment 10 +
Source RPM: task-sugar-0.112-3.mga7.noarch.rpm => task-sugar-0.112-3.mga7.noarch task-sugar-0.112-5.mga8.noarch
Version: 7 => Cauldron

Comment 14 Morgan Leijström 2020-10-12 12:39:19 CEST
In https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2020-09/msg00276.html Jani wrote:

"
Sugar was ported to python3 after mga7 was released and starts OK in
Cauldron after I applied a patch from upstream.

However I don't know if it's used by anyone.
  "

With the maintainer gone (José Jorge) and not much used i suggest dropping Sugar desktop.
Comment 15 Morgan Leijström 2020-11-18 19:33:35 CET
Will probably get dropped

https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/dev/2020-10/msg00105.html
Comment 16 Manuel Hiebel 2021-03-04 21:54:10 CET
was dropped

Resolution: (none) => FIXED
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED

Comment 17 Morgan Leijström 2021-03-04 22:38:50 CET
Sugar is still in 8 and cauldron /core/release/

You mean decided to be dropped ?
Comment 18 Morgan Leijström 2022-05-20 10:13:47 CEST
(In reply to Manuel Hiebel from comment #16)
> was dropped

It seem to still be in Cauldron

https://madb.mageia.org/package/list/t_search/sugar/release/cauldron
And in repos.

Is working in Cauldron/mga9 ?

Not launching in mga8, another QA member report. (64 bit, launch from SDDM)

Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Target Milestone: Mageia 8 => Mageia 9
Whiteboard: MGA7TOO => MGA8TOO
Resolution: FIXED => (none)

Morgan Leijström 2022-05-20 10:19:26 CEST

Blocks: (none) => 30163

Comment 19 Ben McMonagle 2022-05-21 02:45:38 CEST
tried F36 Sugar on a Stick -HDD install and that seems to work, so it appears to be Mageia implementation that has an issue.

CC: (none) => westel

Comment 20 Morgan Leijström 2023-06-02 11:24:31 CEST
Sugar 0.120 is in release for Mageia 9.
Do we know it works, and can close this bug?
Comment 21 sturmvogel 2023-06-02 14:57:11 CEST
MGA8 x86_64 Plasma Host
MGA9 x86_64 Plasma VirtualBox Guest

Sugar does not start. After selecting sugar in SDDM and login, the window goes completely black. Nothing happens....

Still grandiosely broken...
Morgan Leijström 2023-06-02 14:58:31 CEST

Keywords: (none) => FOR_ERRATA9

Morgan Leijström 2023-06-17 21:20:00 CEST

Summary: Sugar desktop: missing dependency => Sugar desktop: black
Keywords: FOR_ERRATA9 => IN_ERRATA9

Comment 22 papoteur 2023-06-18 20:37:56 CEST
Tried the launch, and extracted the pertinent part in journal:
juin 18 19:38:59 sddm-helper[2499]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file
juin 18 19:38:59 sddm-helper[2499]: gkr-pam: stashed password to try later in open session
juin 18 19:38:59 systemd[1]: Started session-c2.scope.
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2457 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: Modules linked in: snd_hrtimer ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 xt_comment ip6table_mangle ip6table_nat ip6table_raw ip6table_filter ip6_tables xt_recent ipt_IFWLOG ipt_p>
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  intel_powerclamp snd_timer rapl snd psmouse e1000 joydev i2c_piix4 soundcore vboxguest evdev input_leds sch_fq_codel msr dm_mod fuse loop configfs dmi_sysfs ip_tab>
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 2457 Comm: sddm-greeter Not tainted 6.3.5-desktop-1.mga9 #1
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: Code: 01 01 e8 a9 3a 9e ff 0f 0b c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 6a 77 31 01 00 75 85 48 c7 c7 70 07 4e b8 c6 05 5a 77 31 01 01 e8 86 3a 9e ff <0f> 0b c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 45 >
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffa63f80ab3d40 EFLAGS: 00010286
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9716d87fc400 RCX: 0000000000000027
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RDX: ffff97173dc1d648 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff97173dc1d640
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RBP: ffff9716e0d63e00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa63f80ab3be8
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb88c2f08 R12: 0000000000000040
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: R13: ffff9716e0d63e58 R14: ffff9716e0d63e40 R15: 0000000000000040
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: FS:  00007fc7d7516880(0000) GS:ffff97173dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: CR2: 0000000001069008 CR3: 00000000137aa003 CR4: 00000000000706f0
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: Call Trace:
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  <TASK>
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? __warn+0x7d/0x130
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? report_bug+0x16d/0x1a0
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? handle_bug+0x41/0x70
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  drm_gem_handle_delete+0x8c/0xd0 [drm]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? __pfx_vmw_bo_unref_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [vmwgfx]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  vmw_bo_unref_ioctl+0xf/0x20 [vmwgfx]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc1/0x160 [drm]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  drm_ioctl+0x24c/0x490 [drm]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? __pfx_vmw_bo_unref_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [vmwgfx]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? do_vmi_munmap+0xc7/0x120
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  ? __pfx_drm_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  vmw_generic_ioctl+0xab/0x140 [vmwgfx]
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fc7d8321e68
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: Code: 00 00 48 8d 44 24 08 48 89 54 24 e0 48 89 44 24 c0 48 8d 44 24 d0 48 89 44 24 c8 b8 10 00 00 00 c7 44 24 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 07 89 >
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffc356453f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc7ac70f920 RCX: 00007fc7d8321e68
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RDX: 00007ffc35645448 RSI: 0000000040086442 RDI: 000000000000000e
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: RBP: 00007ffc35645448 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 00007fc7ac072d90
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: R10: 00007ffc357e8080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040086442
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: R13: 000000000000000e R14: 0000000001fac140 R15: 00007ffc35645668
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel:  </TASK>
juin 18 19:38:59 kernel: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
juin 18 19:38:59 systemd-logind[675]: New session c2 of user yves.
juin 18 19:38:59 sddm-helper[2499]: pam_unix(sddm:session): session opened for user yves(uid=1000) by (uid=0)
juin 18 19:38:59 sddm-helper[2437]: pam_unix(sddm-greeter:session): session closed for user sddm
juin 18 19:38:59 systemd-logind[675]: Session c1 logged out. Waiting for processes to exit.
juin 18 19:38:59 systemd[1]: session-c1.scope: Deactivated successfully.
juin 18 19:38:59 systemd[1]: session-c1.scope: Consumed 1.362s CPU time.

CC: (none) => yves.brungard_mageia

Comment 23 Morgan Leijström 2023-06-19 21:46:44 CEST
If we are to keep it
 -and soon really fix it!

then now drop the blocking of
 Bug 30163 - [TRACKER] Packages that need to be obsoleted
Comment 24 Nicolas Lécureuil 2023-06-19 23:45:26 CEST
no updates since 2021, i think we should drop it

CC: (none) => mageia

Comment 25 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-17 15:55:33 CEST
task-sugar 0.120-1 is still in cauldron.

Target Milestone: Mageia 9 => Mageia 10
Blocks: 30163 => 32127

Comment 26 papoteur 2023-10-17 18:13:31 CEST
I found that sugar miss a requires:
python3-decorator
After added it, I can launch sugar from SDDM
I have however obsoleted sugar-runner which uses still Python2, not touched since 7 years.
Comment 27 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-17 18:35:56 CEST
Nice.
So we can add that require and make it work in mga9 (possibly mga8 too) :)
Later we decide if to keep sugar in mga10.

Can you put that fix in mga9 testing, then set this to QA?


sugar-runner is a emulator for development​.
sugar-runner is already in mga9, i guess best is just let it be.
Normal users dont use it and developers know about Python2

Source RPM: task-sugar-0.112-3.mga7.noarch task-sugar-0.112-5.mga8.noarch => task-sugar-0.120-1.mga9.noarch
Whiteboard: MGA8TOO => MGA8TOO, MGA9TOO

Comment 28 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-17 18:49:53 CEST
Also, make sugar-runner not be autoselected when selecting task-sugar!
And without sugar-runner maybe other packages are not needed to be required either, I guess as an example x11-server-xephyr?
Comment 29 papoteur 2023-10-17 21:57:16 CEST
Updated in cauldron
Submitted in Mageia 9:
sugar-cp-webaccount-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-datetime-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-background-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-power-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-frame-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-updater-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-keyboard-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-modemconfiguration-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-language-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-all-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-backup-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-network-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm
sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch.rpm

Source:
sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.src.rpm

Submitted Mageia 8:
sugar-cp-webaccount-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-background-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-power-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-datetime-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-frame-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-updater-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-keyboard-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-modemconfiguration-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-backup-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-language-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-network-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-cp-all-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm
sugar-0.120-2.1.mga8.noarch.rpm

Source
sugar-0.120-2.1.mga8.src.rpm
papoteur 2023-10-17 22:00:20 CEST

Whiteboard: MGA8TOO, MGA9TOO => MGA8TOO
Assignee: pkg-bugs => qa-bugs
Status comment: Solution or drop it. see comment 10 + => (none)
Version: Cauldron => 9

Comment 30 papoteur 2023-10-17 22:03:16 CEST
Advisory:
========
Launching the sugar desktop session wasn't possible.
The new release adds a requirement of python-decorator which was missing.
========

For Mageia 8
========
Launching the sugar desktop session wasn't possible.
The new release has been updated to 0.120 and adds a requirement of python-decorator which was missing.
========
Comment 31 Ben McMonagle 2023-10-17 22:21:57 CEST
oh dear, something appears to be wrong:

Sorry, the following packages cannot be selected:

- sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied typelib(Xkl)[== 1.0])
- sugar-cp-all-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar-cp-background)
- sugar-cp-background-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-backup-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-datetime-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch
- sugar-cp-frame-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-keyboard-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied typelib(Xkl))
- sugar-cp-language-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-modemconfiguration-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-network-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-power-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-updater-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
- sugar-cp-webaccount-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied sugar[== 0.120-2.1.mga9])
Comment 32 Ben McMonagle 2023-10-17 22:37:48 CEST
possibly more helpful:

A requested package cannot be installed:
sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied typelib(WebKit2)[== 4.0])
Comment 33 Ben McMonagle 2023-10-17 23:35:57 CEST
mostly working.

just cannot register with the sugar.org server
Comment 34 papoteur 2023-10-18 08:23:46 CEST
(In reply to Ben McMonagle from comment #32)
> possibly more helpful:
> 
> A requested package cannot be installed:
> sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied typelib(WebKit2)[== 4.0])

Yes, this is more helpful.
However, I don't understand why you can't install this requires. 
urpmq --whatprovides "typelib(WebKit2)"
lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.0|lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.1
Comment 35 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-18 10:10:20 CEST
Here mga9-64 no problem installing.
Will test later.
Comment 36 Dave Hodgins 2023-10-18 16:02:41 CEST
(In reply to papoteur from comment #34)
> (In reply to Ben McMonagle from comment #32)
> > possibly more helpful:
> > 
> > A requested package cannot be installed:
> > sugar-0.120-2.1.mga9.noarch (due to unsatisfied typelib(WebKit2)[== 4.0])
> 
> Yes, this is more helpful.
> However, I don't understand why you can't install this requires. 
> urpmq --whatprovides "typelib(WebKit2)"
> lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.0|lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.1

# rpm -q --provides lib64webkit2gtk4.1_0
lib64webkit2gtk4.1_0 = 2.40.3-1.mga9
lib64webkit2gtk4.1_0(x86-64) = 2.40.3-1.mga9
libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0()(64bit)

On a Mageia 8 install ...
$ rpm -q --provides lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.0
lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.0 = 2.40.5-1.mga8
lib64webkit2gtk-gir4.0(x86-64) = 2.40.5-1.mga8
typelib(WebKit2) = 4.0
typelib(WebKit2WebExtension) = 4.0

So m8 has a version specific provides while m9 does not.

CC: (none) => davidwhodgins

Comment 37 Marja Van Waes 2023-10-23 14:55:39 CEST
@ papoteur

I haven't uploaded the advisory, yet, because it is unclear to me whether the package needs to be updated for Mageia 8. See the comments above.

Keywords: (none) => feedback

Comment 38 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-25 23:00:19 CEST
OK on mga9-64

Running on: nvidia470, kernel 6.4.16-desktop-4.mga9, intel i7-870, DM:sddm

It launches, and I surfed web, tested OK to draw and write, and some other stuff.

Some things does not work but we can work on that later... maybe
§ Like Ben noted above, it fail to connect to sever when trying to register
§ Calculator do  not launch
§ Programming example opens but fail to run, could not find a file
§ It is not adapted well to a 4K screen

Whiteboard: MGA8TOO => MGA8TOO, MGA9-64-OK

Comment 39 Thomas Andrews 2023-10-29 20:04:43 CET
OK on mga8-64

Tested in a Plasma Guest in VirtualBox. I used QArepo to download the proposed packages, then went to MCC and installed task-sugar. That pulled in sugar, and 192 dependencies, mostly Gnome-related packages from the look of it. Strangely enough, it did not bring in any of the sugar-cp packages.

I rebooted anyway, logging into sugar. I only played a little, but most seemed to work. Then I logged out and back into Plasma, and installed sugar-cp-all, which apparently drew in the rest of the cp packages. I rebooted once more, logging into sugar again, and again most seemed to work.

Removing the feedback flag, and validating. Marja, go ahead with the advisory from comment 30

CC: (none) => andrewsfarm, sysadmin-bugs
Keywords: feedback => validated_update
Whiteboard: MGA8TOO, MGA9-64-OK => MGA8TOO, MGA9-64-OK MGA8-64-OK

Marja Van Waes 2023-10-30 14:59:07 CET

Keywords: (none) => advisory

Comment 40 Mageia Robot 2023-10-31 00:07:40 CET
An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository.

https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2023-0111.html

Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 41 Morgan Leijström 2023-10-31 10:01:10 CET
Errata 9 updated.  Was and is not in Errata 8.


___Note for future work:

We dropped the emulator for development​, sugar-runner - Comment 26.

Some issues to maybe have a look at - Comment 38.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.