Bug 17303 - Veracrypt 1.16 on Mageia 5 KDE
Summary: Veracrypt 1.16 on Mageia 5 KDE
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New RPM package request (show other bugs)
Version: 5
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-12-07 12:20 CET by Sébastien B.
Modified: 2015-12-07 12:40 CET (History)
0 users

See Also:
Source RPM:
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Sébastien B. 2015-12-07 12:20:47 CET
Description of problem:
Hello,
On KDe desktop,while it works on XFCE, 
during installation of veracrypt after root in execution of "./" an error message appears:
"Verifying archive integrity ... All good.
Uncompressing VeraCrypt 1.16 install ..
app unnamed (3300): KUniqueApplication: Can not find the D-Bus server session: "Did not Receive a reply Possible causes include:. the remote app About did not send a reply, the post bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired , or the network connection Was broken. "

app unnamed (3270): KUniqueApplication: Pipe closed Unexpectedly. "

no error message under XFCE.

Is the creation of a package possible?

Regards,

Vigen.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Veracrypt 1.16


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.extratc veracrypt-1.16.tar.bz2
2.select the file you want.
3.In root "./etcetc"


Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Samuel Verschelde 2015-12-07 12:30:06 CET
Not sure we can provide it on our mirrors due to the TrueCrypt License, even in non-free.

Quoting Wikipedia:

"VeraCrypt has been licensed under the Apache License 2.0 since 28 June 2015.[30] Prior to that, it was released under the Microsoft Public License.[31] VeraCrypt inherited a substantial amount of code from its TrueCrypt predecessor and thus is also subject to the terms of version 3.0 of the "TrueCrypt License" which is unique to the TrueCrypt software.[32][33] It is not part of the pantheon of widely used open source licenses and is not a free software license according to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) license list, as it contains distribution and copyright-liability restrictions.[34]"
Samuel Verschelde 2015-12-07 12:30:22 CET

Ever confirmed: 1 => 0
Status: NEW => UNCONFIRMED

Comment 2 Sébastien B. 2015-12-07 12:35:26 CET
Ok thanks for this quick answer :)

I switch to résolved...

Status: UNCONFIRMED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 3 Rémi Verschelde 2015-12-07 12:40:05 CET
Closing as wontfix then, though it could maybe be packaged as a nonfree package if a packager is interested.

Resolution: FIXED => WONTFIX


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.