Description of problem: We currently have two packages that appear to be similar: - lib64dbusmenuqt5_2-0.9.3-0.20150604bzr.2.mga6.x86_64 - lib64dbusmenuqt52-0.9.3-0.20150604bzr.1.mga6.x86_64 Are both necessary? Reproducible: Steps to Reproduce:
Summary: doubloon with qt ? => Duplicate package for libdbusmenuqt5
(In reply to Georges Eckenschwiller from comment #0) > We currently have two packages that appear to be similar: > - lib64dbusmenuqt5_2-0.9.3-0.20150604bzr.2.mga6.x86_64 > - lib64dbusmenuqt52-0.9.3-0.20150604bzr.1.mga6.x86_64 The second one was likely a mistake when formatting the library name, the proper one is the 5_2 version. The duplicate package will get removed when the sysadmins clean the repo for RPMs that do not match a SRPM, as they do every once in a while.
Adding obsoletes in the new package would probably be a good idea though, as libdbusmenuqt52 also existed in Mageia 5. Assigning to Nicolas who fixed the lib name.
Assignee: bugsquad => mageia
should be fixed in next libdbusmenu-qt
OK is fixed Thanks Nicolas
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => FIXED