Bug 15 - Infrastructure vs Websites products : needed ? coherent ?
Summary: Infrastructure vs Websites products : needed ? coherent ?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Bugzilla (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: i586 Linux
Priority: Normal enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: D Morgan
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-02-12 01:05 CET by Samuel Verschelde
Modified: 2011-02-14 01:01 CET (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Source RPM:
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Samuel Verschelde 2011-02-12 01:05:12 CET
I'm not sure we need to separate infrastructure and websites products. 

However, if we maintain that distinction : 
- shouldn't the maint db component belong to infrastructure ?
- same question for identity.mageia.org, which is quite central
- need to order the products, so that the Mageia product is first

WDYT ?
Comment 1 D Morgan 2011-02-12 10:04:46 CET
yes this is needed because infrastructure is for sysadmin bugs.
BS, Bugzila, maintainance needed, ...
Comment 2 Samuel Verschelde 2011-02-12 20:55:00 CET
Well, there's a logic behind the split, but that doesn't means it's needed :)

If you take an outsider view, knowing which team is in charge has no importance at all. All those are parts of the whole mageia infrastructure, at different levels. That's why I would group everything under the "Mageia's Infrastructure" product.

But I agree that you can disagree :)
Comment 3 Samuel Verschelde 2011-02-12 20:55:55 CET
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, there's a logic behind the split, but that doesn't means it's needed :)
> 
> If you take an outsider view, knowing which team is in charge has no importance
> at all. All those are parts of the whole mageia infrastructure, at different
> levels. That's why I would group everything under the "Mageia's Infrastructure"
> product.
> 
> But I agree that you can disagree :)

And the questions about which product for maintdb and identity (and the underlying LDAP server) still remain :)
D Morgan 2011-02-12 23:31:47 CET

Priority: --- => Normal

Comment 4 D Morgan 2011-02-14 01:01:21 CET
the label for bugzilla explain for what this is "ask new products", ... so there is confusion possible.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.