Bug 14077 - VirtualBox fails to start VDM after Cauldron s/w update Sept.4 (OK on 32-bit)
Summary: VirtualBox fails to start VDM after Cauldron s/w update Sept.4 (OK on 32-bit)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 14074
Alias: None
Product: Mageia
Classification: Unclassified
Component: RPM Packages (show other bugs)
Version: Cauldron
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
Priority: Normal normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mageia Bug Squad
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-09-09 17:02 CEST by Maurice Batey
Modified: 2014-09-09 19:59 CEST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Source RPM: virtualbox-4.3.14-2.mga5.src.rpm
CVE:
Status comment:


Attachments

Description Maurice Batey 2014-09-09 17:02:54 CEST
Description of problem:

Virtualbox fails when starting VDM:

  "Failed to open a session for the virtual machine Windows XP SP3.

Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_NO_EXEC_MEMORY).

Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005)
Component: Console
Interface: IConsole {8ab7c520-2442-4b66-8d74-4ff1e195d2b6}"



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  virtualbox-4.3.14-2.mga5.src.rpm

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start VirtualBox
2. Request start a VDM
3. Fails as described above

N.B. This failure (which appears not to affect 32-bit Mageia-5A2) happens since a Cauldron s/w update on Septeember 4th, when e.g. the following were installed:

  virtualbox-kernel-3.17.0-desktop-0.rc3.1.mga5-4.3.14-2.mga5.x86_64.rpm 
  kernel-desktop-devel-latest-3.17.0-0.rc3.1.mga5.x86_64.rpm from 

Further details of that update can be seen at:

  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10969499/sw-update-mga5A2-4-9-14-edited

N.B. This problem has been reported by two other users recently in
gmane.linux.mageia.devel under the the header: 
  "Since latest kernel upgrade - virtualbox fails"

Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:
Maurice Batey 2014-09-09 17:03:18 CEST

CC: (none) => maurice

Comment 1 Bit Twister 2014-09-09 17:09:58 CEST
FYI: latest virtualbox update fixed my problem.

CC: (none) => junknospam

Comment 2 Thomas Backlund 2014-09-09 17:12:29 CEST
already fixed

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14074 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => tmb
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE

Comment 3 Maurice Batey 2014-09-09 19:02:49 CEST
 Bit Twister 2014-09-09 17:09:58 CEST:

> FYI: latest virtualbox update fixed my problem.

Lucky you! I tried the update but it messed up (as did a repeat).

The update session log can be seen here:

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10969499/sw-update-log-9-9-14

If that is a showstopper for me I will think about  trying a Mageia-5A2 'update' install, otherwise hold off until Beta1.
Comment 4 Thomas Backlund 2014-09-09 19:16:58 CEST
You can try to tell urpmi to go 1 package at a time, so:

urpmi --auto-update --split-length=1
Comment 5 Thomas Backlund 2014-09-09 19:31:44 CEST
Oh, and I see you also have a non-mga package also blocking the install

ooRexx-4.2.0-9940.opensuse1230.x86_64


So nuke that one and let the update continue...
Comment 6 Maurice Batey 2014-09-09 19:47:34 CEST
 Thomas Backlund 2014-09-09 19:16:58 CEST:

> You can try to tell urpmi to go 1 package at a time, so:
> urpmi --auto-update --split-length=1

   Tried that and the update then worked perfectly, also VirtualBox is back to normal!
  Many thanks, Thomas.

Why would the 'split-length=1' option make such a huge difference, I wonder...
Comment 7 Maurice Batey 2014-09-09 19:59:14 CEST
> I see you also have a non-mga package also blocking the install
> ooRexx-4.2.0-9940.opensuse1230.x86_64
> So nuke that one and let the update continue...

  I've been using ooRexx for years now, and have never had an update mess up because of it. How is it 'blocking the install'?

This highly-successful update seems to have ignored it apart from - right at the end - reporting:

   "Installation failed:    /sbin/service is needed by (installed) ooRexx-      4.2.0-9940.opensuse1230.x86_64"

But /sbin/service *is* there, and ooRexx does work, so why does the installer put that message out for this Cauldron update?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.