hi, Description of problem: there is not libflashplayer.so / flashplayer Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.active all nofree, contrib depot 2.research in add/remove software all program 3.not flashplayer i use only chromium thank you
the name is flash-player-plugin (i586 arch)
CC: (none) => manuel
for the x86_64 arch, read bug 967
sorry for "my newbie" and my bad english, but i don't found plugin
Created attachment 327 [details] not in list
Created attachment 328 [details] 32bits activate
no problem, I'm as bad in English There are security problems in the 64-bit, so it was decided to not add it. see bug 913 Vous pouvez regardé ici: http://wiki.mandriva.com/fr/Plugin_flash_pour_firefox_en_64bits#Installation_du_lecteur_propri.C3.A9taire_Flash_64-bit_d.E2.80.99Adobe c'est la plus simple manière d'installer le plugin en 64bits, mais comme il a de réel probleme de securités, il a été décidé de ne pas l'intégrer dans les depots.
So same as bug 913 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 913 ***
Status: NEW => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => DUPLICATE
oui mais la i586 ?? m'en fou de la 64 bits si je peux mettre la 32bits mais elle apparaît pas non plus... ---- yes but where is i586 ?? it is not important 64 bits version if i can put 32 bits version but i don't see that.
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENEDResolution: DUPLICATE => (none)
it is in nonfree release http://88.191.121.20/madb/mageia/index.php/rpm/show/distrelease/1/application/0/arch/1/media/8/source/0/t_group/26/level/3/group_name/Networking|WWW/id/55640 nonfree of i586 is not added as repo in x86_64, and it is still a duplicate
This is worthy of an Errata entry. http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=mageia1:errata#flash_player_issues
CC: (none) => ennael1Component: New RPM package request => RPM Packages
for the moment, i have install (rpm) : http://get.adobe.com/fr/flashplayer/?no_redirect it is okay, it run good.
edit sorry version is : Flash Player 10.2.159.1 for i386 okay for chromium x86_64
duplicate *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 913 ***
Status: REOPENED => RESOLVEDResolution: (none) => DUPLICATE