Bug 967

Summary:	flash-player-plugin-review requested for non-free or tainted
Product:	Mageia	Reporter:	Dick Gevers <dvgevers>
Component:	New RPM package request	Assignee:	Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Normal	CC:	manuel.mageia
Version:	Cauldron
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Source RPM:		CVE:
Status comment:

Description Dick Gevers 2011-04-24 20:58:30 CEST

Description of problem:

I installed lightspark-mozilla-plugin and related (*) to try and access (for example) 
http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/

but this gives me an error reading:
quote
We're sorry. Lightspark encountered a yet unsupported Flash file
SWF file: http://admin.brightcove.com/viewer/us1.25.02.05.2011-04-20162628/BrightcoveBootloader.swf?player Cause: argslen--1 && args[0]->getObjectType()==T_STRING /home/iurt/BUILD/lightspark-0.4.6.1/script
unquote

Under Mandriva using the package from plf: 
flash-player-plugin-preview-10.3.162.29-1plf2011.0.x86_64
I have no problem viewing the above.

(*) being:
lib64agg2-2.5-9.mga1.x86_64 
lib64boost_date_time1.44.0-1.44.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
lib64boost_thread1.44.0-1.44.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
tslib-common-1.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
lib64boost_system1.44.0-1.44.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
lib64boost_filesystem1.44.0-1.44.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
lib64ts0.0_0-1.0-6.mga1.x86_64 
lib64gnash0-0.8.9-2.mga1.x86_64 
lib64ftgl2-2.1.3-0.rc5.5.mga1.x86_64 
lib64glew1.5-1.5.8-1.mga1.x86_64 
lib64lightspark0-0.4.6.1-1.mga1.x86_64 
lightspark-mozilla-plugin-0.4.6.1-1.mga1.x86_64 
lightspark-0.4.6.1-1.mga1.x86_64 installed
lightspark-pulse-0.4.6.1-1.mga1.x86_64 
gnash-0.8.9-2.mga1.x86_64

Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2011-04-24 21:24:48 CEST

Please see: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913#c1

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 913 ***

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => manuel
Resolution: (none) => DUPLICATE

Comment 2 Dick Gevers 2011-04-24 22:18:02 CEST

I don't think it is a duplicate.

Because the warnings shows in bug 913 affect older versions of flash-player.

The one in plf has a higher version, so the judgement stated in 913 cannot be blindly applied to verison 10.3.162.29

Comment 3 Ahmad Samir 2011-04-24 22:31:39 CEST

The 64bit Adobe flash is the same one that's in bug 913, which hasn't been updated since last November and doesn't have any of the sec fixes that the 32bit version got; so it's the same one that Mageia will not ship in the official repos, AFAICS.

Comment 4 Dick Gevers 2011-04-24 22:33:32 CEST

Okay. If you say so.