Bug 9391

Summary:	core 32bit backports in x64
Product:	Mageia	Reporter:	ra oeai <oeai>
Component:	RPM Packages	Assignee:	Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID	QA Contact:
Severity:	minor
Priority:	Normal
Version:	Cauldron
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Source RPM:		CVE:
Status comment:

Description ra oeai 2013-03-14 20:15:08 CET

runned drakrpm-update from terminal

in drakrpm i had other medias selected and absolutely no 32bit backports, while some greyed marks are there, but they are not for 32bit backports +testing

is this alright, because of some noarch probably?

Reproducible: 

Steps to Reproduce:

Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2013-03-14 20:37:12 CET

I don't understand your bug

what is the output of urpmq --list-media and urpmq --list-media active ?

As default you should have Core Release, Core Updates, Core 32bit Release and Core 32bit Updates activate.

Comment 2 ra oeai 2013-03-14 20:38:50 CET

# urpmq --list-media
Core Release (distrib1)
Core Release Debug (distrib2)
Core Updates (distrib3)
Core Updates Debug (distrib4)
Core Updates Testing (distrib5)
Core Updates Testing Debug (distrib6)
Core Backports (distrib7)
Core Backports Debug (distrib8)
Core Backports Testing (distrib9)
Core Backports Testing Debug (distrib10)
Nonfree Release (distrib11)
Nonfree Release Debug (distrib12)
Nonfree Updates (distrib13)
Nonfree Updates Debug (distrib14)
Nonfree Updates Testing (distrib15)
Nonfree Updates Testing Debug (distrib16)
Nonfree Backports (distrib17)
Nonfree Backports Debug (distrib18)
Nonfree Backports Testing (distrib19)
Nonfree Backports Testing Debug (distrib20)
Tainted Release (distrib21)
Tainted Release Debug (distrib22)
Tainted Updates (distrib23)
Tainted Updates Debug (distrib24)
Tainted Updates Testing (distrib25)
Tainted Updates Testing Debug (distrib26)
Tainted Backports (distrib27)
Tainted Backports Debug (distrib28)
Tainted Backports Testing (distrib29)
Tainted Backports Testing Debug (distrib30)
Core 32bit Release (distrib31)
Core 32bit Release Debug (distrib32)
Core 32bit Updates (distrib33)
Core 32bit Updates Debug (distrib34)
Core 32bit Updates Testing (distrib35)
Core 32bit Updates Testing Debug (distrib36)
Core 32bit Backports (distrib37)
Core 32bit Backports Debug (distrib38)
Core 32bit Backports Testing (distrib39)
Core 32bit Backports Testing Debug (distrib40)


# urpmq --list-media active
Core Release (distrib1)
Core Updates (distrib3)
Core Updates Testing (distrib5)
Core Backports (distrib7)
Nonfree Release (distrib11)
Nonfree Updates (distrib13)

Comment 3 Manuel Hiebel 2013-03-14 20:42:14 CET

so what is wrong ?

Comment 4 Manuel Hiebel 2013-03-14 21:08:01 CET

nothing, or likely a users misunderstand. 

if that was the question, core 32bits repositories are here for nonfree or thirdly part packages that would need 32bits libs or dependences. (or like wine)

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => INVALID

Comment 5 ra oeai 2013-03-15 00:29:37 CET

the thing is that drakrpm + urpmi media (repo) list is not equal to drakrpm-update media list