| Summary: | bash-completion is not installed by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Pierre Jarillon <jarillon> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | CC: | eeeemail, ennael1, thierry.vignaud, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | bash | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Pierre Jarillon
2013-02-10 21:57:04 CET
Manuel Hiebel
2013-02-10 22:10:53 CET
Source RPM:
(none) =>
meta-task
claire robinson
2013-02-11 00:11:56 CET
Priority:
Normal =>
release_blocker Sorry this cannot be release critical Priority:
release_blocker =>
High Isn't release_blocker for things which can't be corrected by an update? Well not having bash_completion installed by default is not blocking. Do we want this really by default? (This is just a question) It's certainly useful to have with systemd services. I think it's something people expect to be able to use. It's relatively trivial to add IIUC. Is there a reason not to? (also just a question) Did I say that? It's not about that but rather what is a release critical bug. If everyone add release critical bugs to have more packages on iso it will just become non manageable I didn't intend to anger you, was really just asking the question. It's your call :) Fixed in bash: it now suggests bash-completion Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED Note that this imply adding python to minimal install (when using suggests) as bash-completion has a require on 'python(abi)' |