| Summary: | most of libreoffice-langpack- doesn't require locales-?? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Luc Menut <lmenut> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | release_blocker | CC: | dmorganec, ennael1, marja11, thierry.vignaud |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | 3beta1 | ||
| Source RPM: | libreoffice-4.0.0.1-1.mga3.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 8751 | ||
|
Description
Luc Menut
2013-01-17 00:12:21 CET
Luc Menut
2013-01-17 00:14:10 CET
Priority:
Normal =>
release_blocker pb when migrating to LO4 i think, we will take a look The removal of -U from most of %langpack's arguments could be the problem (svn rev. 331200). lines 819 to 895 in http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/libreoffice/current/SPECS/libreoffice.spec?r1=331193&r2=331200
Thierry Vignaud
2013-01-19 21:57:05 CET
Blocks:
(none) =>
8751
Marja Van Waes
2013-01-19 23:09:11 CET
CC:
(none) =>
marja11 Fixed Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED Thanks Thierry, libreoffice-4.0.0.1-6 fixes this bug for most of the locales, but the requires is still missing for nso and pt-BR. On a system without LO (locales-en and locales-fr installed), if I try to install LO-writer (1), urpmi libreoffice-writer In order to satisfy the 'libreoffice-langpack[== 4.0.0.1-6.mga3]' dependency, one of the following packages is needed: 1- libreoffice-langpack-fr-4.0.0.1-6.mga3.i586: French language pack for LibreOffice (to install) 2- libreoffice-langpack-en-4.0.0.1-6.mga3.i586: English language pack for LibreOffice (to install) 3- libreoffice-langpack-nso-4.0.0.1-6.mga3.i586: Northern Sotho language pack for LibreOffice (to install) 4- libreoffice-langpack-pt-BR-4.0.0.1-6.mga3.i586: Brazilian Portuguese language pack for LibreOffice (to install) What is your choice? (1-4) Ideally 3- and 4- shouldn't be proposed: - libreoffice-langpack-nso is not a regression versus LO 3.5.5 in mga2; we have locales-nso, couln't we require it in LO-langpack-nso? - libreoffice-langpack-pt-BR doesn't requires locales-pt (it requires it in LO 3.5.5), and I don't understand why: it have the "-u pt" ?? (1) I applied your fix in Resolve.pm svn. rev 7148 "(_is_selected_or_installed) fix scoring locale packages" regards, Luc |