Bug 6118

Summary:	rpmdrake fails to show 32bits packages in searches
Product:	Mageia	Reporter:	Simple <simplew8>
Component:	RPM Packages	Assignee:	Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID	QA Contact:
Severity:	major
Priority:	Normal	CC:	andr999, pmdenielou
Version:	2
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Source RPM:	rpmdrake-5.34-1.mga2	CVE:
Status comment:

Description Simple 2012-05-27 19:54:22 CEST

Theme name: elementary
Kernel version = 3.3.6-desktop-2.mga2
Distribution=Mageia release 2 (Official) for x86_64
CPU=Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz

I have run rpmdrake and typed "canberra" in the search field and it only showed x86_64 packages, and that was weird since i have added the complete pack of urpmi sources.

To be sure i went to cli and made a query, see the output:

~]# urpmq -yfa canberra
canberra-common-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
canberra-gtk-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
lib64canberra-devel-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
lib64canberra-gtk-devel-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
lib64canberra-gtk0-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
lib64canberra-gtk3_0-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
lib64canberra0-0.28-10.mga2.x86_64
libcanberra-devel-0.28-10.mga2.i586
libcanberra-gtk-devel-0.28-10.mga2.i586
libcanberra-gtk0-0.28-10.mga2.i586
libcanberra-gtk3_0-0.28-10.mga2.i586
libcanberra0-0.28-10.mga2.i586

and here it lists the available 32bits packages that were not listed in rpmdrake.

Comment 1 Manuel Hiebel 2012-05-27 20:13:48 CEST

works fine here, the i586 packages are at the end of the list

Status: NEW => UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed: 1 => 0

Comment 2 Simple 2012-05-27 20:57:54 CEST

I dont understand this, now that i have installed package libcanberra-gtk3_0, in rpmdrake qhen searching for "canberra" now shows also the 32bits packages.

So maybe wasnt showing in the first place because the was no 32bit canberra package installed, but this still needs confirmation, im kinda lost here...

Comment 3 Malo Deniélou 2012-06-09 17:13:50 CEST

Maybe you had selected the "Installed" option in rpmdrake, that only shows the already installed packages.

CC: (none) => malo

Comment 4 andré blais 2013-04-18 10:17:06 CEST

temporary glitch ?

Status: UNCONFIRMED => RESOLVED
CC: (none) => andre999mga
Resolution: (none) => INVALID