| Summary: | libfaad is missing to mplayer and vlc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | José Jorge <lists.jjorge> |
| Component: | New RPM package request | Assignee: | Anne Nicolas <ennael1> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | LpSolit, davidwhodgins, oliver.bgr, pterjan, sebastien.guerin.news, thierry.vignaud, yleny |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | libfaad | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 338 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
José Jorge
2011-03-28 14:46:31 CEST
I have built it (and rebuilt xinelib with faad enabled) locally but haven't imported it yet. We should have some policy on tainted packages ASAP! Only one month till version freeze fter all. Oliver CC:
(none) =>
oliver.bgr well we need to be able to build different version of packages including tainted deps or not. It's still in todo list I don't understand. Is it the build system who needs work to allow several worksflows? For PLF, this was done in a separate machine, maybe we could do the same way to to get tainted before version freeze? It's no problem with "purely tainted" packages like libfaad, those can be built quite easily on our bs. The problem is packages, we need twice, one build only using non-tainted packages and one using the tainted packages as well, e.g. mplayer, xinelib, vlc and so on. We have to find a way that allows the bs to build both packages at the same time from the same src.rpm. Oliver
Ahmad Samir
2011-04-12 08:39:18 CEST
Depends on:
(none) =>
338
Thierry Vignaud
2011-05-09 18:20:18 CEST
CC:
(none) =>
thierry.vignaud
Sébastien GUERIN
2011-05-16 10:34:14 CEST
CC:
(none) =>
sebastien.guerin.news uploaded to tainted Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |