Bug 5404

Created attachment 1992 [details]
rpm -qa

Created attachment 1993 [details]
urpmi kdiff3

it's better to debug with urpmi --debug or the report.bug

chosen voikko-fi-1.10-1.mga2.x86_64 for enchant-dictionary
selecting voikko-fi-1.10-1.mga2.x86_64
requiring locales-fi for voikko-fi-1.10-1.mga2.x86_64
selecting locales-fi-2.14.1-3.mga2.x86_64

There are other packages providing enchant-dictionary, so selecting 'voikko-fi' automatically seems wrong here. "voikko-fi" does provide enchant-dictionary == 3 while the other ones provide enchant-dictionary == 2 (it was needed when there were other less preferred Finnish dictionaries, like aspell and myspell, so that voikko-fi would be preferred), but I think urpmi should still ask which one to install (and prefer the install the dictionary for installed locale), not sure what is wrong here (maybe the fact it is a suggestion instead of a require affects urpmi somehow?).

CC: (none) => anssi.hannula

How to do it, that spell checking dictionaries will be selected based on the installed locales.

I would make it a release-blocker...

It should already be the case, seems like an urpmi bug to me (unless there is something else I'm not seeing).

We have got this relation:
each hunspell-XY is requireing corresponding locales-XY

http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/meta-task/current/SOURCES/rpmsrate-raw?view=markup

153 	CAT_SPELLCHECK
154 	5 hunspell-bg hunspell-ca
155 	4 voikko-fi

http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/Mageia/distrib/1/x86_64/media/media_info/rpmsrate

CAT_SPELLCHECK
  5 myspell-af_ZA myspell-am_AM myspell-ar_AR myspell-az_AZ myspell-bg_BG myspell-bn_BN myspell-br myspell-ca_ES myspell-cs_CZ myspell-csb_CSB myspell-cy_GB myspell-da_DK myspell-de_AT myspell-de_CH myspell-de_DE myspell-el_GR myspell-en_AU myspell-en_CA myspell-en_GB myspell-en_NZ myspell-en_US myspell-en_ZA myspell-eo_EO myspell-es_ES myspell-es_MX myspell-et_EE myspell-eu_ES myspell-fa_FA myspell-fa_IR myspell-fi_FI myspell-fo_FO myspell-fr_BE myspell-fr_FR myspell-fur_IT myspell-fy_NL myspell-ga_IE myspell-gd_GB myspell-gl_ES myspell-gsc_FR myspell-he_IL myspell-hi_IN myspell-hr_HR myspell-hu_HU myspell-hy_AM myspell-id_ID myspell-is_IS myspell-it_IT myspell-km_KH myspell-ku_TR myspell-lt_LT myspell-lv_LV myspell-mg_MG myspell-mi_NZ myspell-mn_MN myspell-mr_IN myspell-ms_MY myspell-nb_NO myspell-ne_NP myspell-nl_NL myspell-nn_NO myspell-nr_ZA myspell-ns_ZA myspell-oc_FR myspell-or_OR myspell-pa_PA myspell-pl_PL myspell-pt_BR myspell-pt_PT myspell-ro_RO myspell-ru_RU myspell-rw_RW myspell-sk_SK myspell-sl_SI myspell-ss_ZA myspell-st_ZA myspell-sv_SE myspell-sw_KE myspell-sw_TZ myspell-ta_TA myspell-th_TH myspell-tl_PH myspell-tn_ZA myspell-ts_ZA myspell-uk_UA myspell-uz_UZ myspell-ve_ZA myspell-vi_VI myspell-xh_ZA myspell-zu_ZA
  4 aspell-af aspell-am aspell-az aspell-be aspell-bg aspell-bn aspell-br aspell-ca aspell-cs aspell-cy aspell-da aspell-de aspell-el aspell-en aspell-eo aspell-es aspell-et aspell-fa aspell-fi aspell-fo aspell-fr aspell-ga aspell-gd aspell-gl aspell-gv aspell-he aspell-hi aspell-hr aspell-hsb aspell-hu aspell-id aspell-is aspell-it aspell-ku aspell-lt aspell-lv aspell-mg aspell-mi aspell-mk aspell-mn aspell-mr aspell-ms aspell-mt aspell-nb aspell-nds aspell-nl aspell-nn aspell-pa aspell-pl aspell-pt aspell-ro aspell-ru aspell-rw aspell-sc aspell-sk aspell-sl aspell-sv aspell-sw aspell-ta aspell-tl aspell-tr aspell-uk aspell-uz aspell-vi aspell-wa aspell-yi aspell-zu
  4 voikko-fi

(In reply to comment #7)
> It should already be the case, seems like an urpmi bug to me (unless there is
> something else I'm not seeing).

How it should work?

Urpmi checks if a requires can be satisfied by multiple packages, and if some of the packages require uninstalled locales, those are ignored.

(In reply to comment #9)
> Urpmi checks if a requires can be satisfied by multiple packages, and if some
> of the packages require uninstalled locales, those are ignored.

And what in case of multiple locales installed? locales-en locales-eo locales-pl will it install only one dictionary or them, or three?

I will mark this a release blocker as this is annoying bug.

It asks the user which one to install.

Lowering to 'normal' priority, as the problem can be fixed after the release.

Priority: release_blocker => Normal
CC: (none) => guillomovitch

Assigning to me, I'll have time to take a look in a few weeks.

Status: NEW => ASSIGNED
Assignee: bugsquad => anssi.hannula

Hi,

This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment.

Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2.

Thanks :)

Cheers,
marja

Keywords: (none) => NEEDINFO

(In reply to comment #5)
voikko-fi got preferred b/c it has a better arch score from is_arch_compat() as all the others are noarch whereas it's x86_64 or i586

See URPM::Resolve::_find_required_package__sort()

Source RPM: urpmi ? => voikko-fi

BTW, Anssi: there's no reason for the voikko-fi subpackage not to be noarch. Only voikko-fi-tools needs to be arched

And indeed making voikko-fi noarch fixed it.

Status: ASSIGNED => RESOLVED
Hardware: i586 => All
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

voikko-fi is actually endianness specific, but since all our architectures are little-endian, I guess it's an acceptable workaround.