| Summary: | 32-bit support libraries needed for 64-bit Mageia | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Andrew <theamazingchiepoo> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | mageia |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | rpmdrake | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Andrew
2012-04-14 20:35:21 CEST
If you have added automatically the repositories, you should have Core 32bit Release. And here are all software in 32bits only. For the script, depends, maybe you can find an INSTALL or README text file like in every source software. Then you can run urpmi with "urpmi dep1 dep2 dep3 ..." BTW, bugzilla is not here for support, see http://www.mageia.org/en/support/ I don't think you understand what I am trying to say (it seems we suffer from a bit of a language barrier). I'll try and explain this again. IBM Lotus Symphony, an application I'm attempting to install on Mageia is dependant on a series of 32-bit (.i586) support libraries. These libraries are not available by default in a 64-bit installation of Mageia (or any linux distro outside of openSUSE and Ubuntu). When attempting to manually find and install these libraries (through the repo you mentioned), RPMdrake creates a "dependancy hell" claiming that there's a conflict and prevents me from having both the .i586 and x86_64 versions installed at the same time. Some, such as glibc aren't even listed in rpmdrake in .i586 form, showing only as available under x86_64. This is a hinderance to people who want to run i586 architecture dependant applications in a native x86_64 platform and should be addressed. Ok I understand indeed better now. Indeed I have check in my VM, and if the package is already installed we can't see the i586 one. (and I have the same with mageia 1) Component:
New RPM package request =>
RPM Packages
Manuel Hiebel
2012-04-16 00:39:39 CEST
Assignee:
bugsquad =>
thierry.vignaud That's not a rpmdrake issue Assignee:
thierry.vignaud =>
bugsquad (In reply to comment #3) > Ok I understand indeed better now. > > Indeed I have check in my VM, and if the package is already installed we can't > see the i586 one. (and I have the same with mageia 1) I can't reproduce that problem. For me it's showing all packages. Installed or not. Tho' that on mga1. CC:
(none) =>
sander.lepik Hi, This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment. Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2. Thanks :) Cheers, marja Keywords:
(none) =>
NEEDINFO I can't reproduce anymore, sander to, and it seems not a bug so closing. Keywords:
NEEDINFO =>
(none) |