| Summary: | 2_b2, option to upgrade from Mandriva should be blocked | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Marja Van Waes <marja11> |
| Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | davidwhodgins, ennael1, mageia, mageia, manuel.mageia, marja11, preugen, qa-bugs, stormi-mageia, thierry.vignaud, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | draklive-install, drakx-installer-stage2 | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Marja Van Waes
2012-03-18 09:56:56 CET
Marja Van Waes
2012-03-18 09:57:47 CET
Priority:
Low =>
Normal I'm not sure about the "Depends on" field, because, if that bug is solved, this one doesn't need to be solved and the other way around. Usually, when the "Depends on" field is used, it means the other bug needs to be solved first before this one can be solved. Maybe in this case I should set this bug to depend on and to block the other one? That would make it clear there is an unusual relationship between the bugs. CC:
(none) =>
manuel
Marja Van Waes
2012-03-18 10:09:29 CET
Assignee:
bugsquad =>
thierry.vignaud Changed summary, because upgrade to 2 from Mdv 2010.2 isn't guaranteed, either, so there are no Mandriva versions left to upgrade from. Summary:
2_b2, option to upgrade from mdv2011 should be blocked =>
2_b2, option to upgrade from Mandriva should be blocked I disagree, that was one of our goal. What's more since we favor our packages in the installer, this should work pretty well 2011.x is special regarding rpm/rpmdb Upgrade from mdv2011 hasn't been our goal. We do not support it. (In reply to comment #3) > I disagree, that was one of our goal. > What's more since we favor our packages in the installer, this should work > pretty well > 2011.x is special regarding rpm/rpmdb Hi Thierry, You only disgree to my statement that upgrade from Mdv 2010.2 to Mageia 2 isn't supported, correct? I read that in a mail to dev-ml from someone who should know, but I admit that that could be his personal opinion instead of a decision that was taken. (In reply to comment #2) > Changed summary, because upgrade to 2 from Mdv 2010.2 isn't guaranteed, either, > so there are no Mandriva versions left to upgrade from. Hi Marja, "guaranteed" is a buzzword of professionals. [I'm|We are] amateur(s) in this case, getting honnor and no money ;^) As I read before, there was the goal to upgrade/replace on basis of mdv2010. Actually there is no real distinction between 2010.1 and 2010.2, if they are patched to latest. How deep migration assistance is going, is another part (may be a milestone definition/discussion). I'll try some experiments with Top1 of my posting and will report about it. Thanks for your assistance, Juergen Hi Jürgen, What I should have written is, that AFAIK upgrading to Mga2 from Mdv2010 is not being tested. I'll cc QA, they know better than me. Regards, Marja CC:
(none) =>
qa-bugs Upgrade from 2010.2 to Mageia 1 is guaranted but not 2010.2 to Mageia 2. It will work for sure but may be bugged in some parts. Anyway we will not guarantee it, no QA tests on this. CC:
(none) =>
ennael1 My understanding is that upgrading is only supposed to be supported going from Mandriva 2010.2 to Mageia 1, or from Mageia 1 to Mageia 2. In all other cases, a clean install should be done. Mageia 2 should only be offering an upgrade from Mageia 1. CC:
(none) =>
davidwhodgins I agree with Dave : it would be better if the installer would refuse to upgrade from anything but Mageia 1. Those who want to risk their installation by another type of upgrade can still use urpmi. CC:
(none) =>
stormi "Not offering to upgrade" doesn't depends on "making upgrading rpm5 works"... Depends on:
2629 =>
(none) Fixed in git Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |