Bug 33178

Summary:	gnome-shell-extension-appindicator js error
Product:	Mageia	Reporter:	Eric Petit <surfzoid>
Component:	RPM Packages	Assignee:	QA Team <qa-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Normal	CC:	andrewsfarm, geiger.david68210, lewyssmith, surfzoid, sysadmin-bugs
Version:	9	Keywords:	advisory, validated_update
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	MGA9-64-OK
Source RPM:	gnome-shell-extension-appindicator	CVE:
Status comment:
Attachments:	gnome-shell/extensions JS ERROR gnome-shell/extensions JS ERROR bis

Description Eric Petit 2024-05-02 21:52:35 CEST

Hi
i already speak about my nautilus freeze, glibc error and so on in other bug report.
So is there something with the following error from attached file.

In gnome-monitor i also see read and write grow to 12 giga, for ```systemd --user```

Comment 1 Eric Petit 2024-05-02 22:37:57 CEST

in fact "JS ERROR" flood my journalctl, sometime, every minutes

Comment 2 sturmvogel 2024-05-03 13:14:05 CEST

You missed to attach the error output…

Comment 3 Eric Petit 2024-05-03 21:02:18 CEST

Created attachment 14525 [details]
gnome-shell/extensions JS ERROR

Here it is.
I just see an explanation here : https://github.com/ubuntu/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/issues/445

CC: (none) => surfzoid

Comment 4 Lewis Smith 2024-05-03 21:14:32 CEST

For info:
Summary     : AppIndicator/KStatusNotifierItem support for GNOME Shell
Description :
This extension integrates Ubuntu AppIndicators and KStatusNotifierItems (KDE's
blessed successor of the systray) into GNOME Shell.
You can use gnome-tweaks (additional package) or run in terminal

Eric, can you also say how you are using this package? Did the error occur from when you started using it, or more recently?

CC: (none) => lewyssmith

Comment 5 Eric Petit 2024-05-03 21:42:21 CEST

(In reply to Lewis Smith from comment #4)
> For info:
> Summary     : AppIndicator/KStatusNotifierItem support for GNOME Shell
> Description :
> This extension integrates Ubuntu AppIndicators and KStatusNotifierItems
> (KDE's
> blessed successor of the systray) into GNOME Shell.
> You can use gnome-tweaks (additional package) or run in terminal
> 
> Eric, can you also say how you are using this package? Did the error occur
> from when you started using it, or more recently?

ii d'ont really know, i just discor it now, also i did an urpme of it and use gnome-shelln-extension web page to use the last version but same issue. The ubuted link i provided say it is appindicator API  badly used by other app.

Comment 6 David GEIGER 2024-05-04 08:05:06 CEST

Please test new gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.noarch.rpm which should fix this issue.


Assigning to QA,

Packages in 9/Core/Updates_testing:
======================
gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.noarch.rpm

From SRPMS:
gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.src.rpm

Assignee: bugsquad => qa-bugs
CC: (none) => geiger.david68210

Comment 7 Eric Petit 2024-05-04 08:32:00 CEST

(In reply to David GEIGER from comment #6)
> Please test new gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
> which should fix this issue.
> 
> 
> Assigning to QA,
> 
> Packages in 9/Core/Updates_testing:
> ======================
> gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.noarch.rpm
> 
> From SRPMS:
> gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-1.mga9.src.rpm

got a not compatible with this gnome version.

Comment 8 David GEIGER 2024-05-04 19:21:47 CEST

So ok please test with upcoming gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-53-1.1.mga9 in Updates_testing repo.

Comment 9 Eric Petit 2024-05-05 19:22:28 CEST

(In reply to David GEIGER from comment #8)
> So ok please test with upcoming
> gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-53-1.1.mga9 in Updates_testing repo.

No more JS ERR, just warning, but not sure it come from appindicator.

gnome-shell[1531]: Can't update stage views actor <unnamed>[<MetaWindowActorX11>:0x77dc190] is on because it needs an allocation.

gnome-shell[1531]: Window manager warning: Invalid WM_TRANSIENT_FOR window 0x2200006 specified for 0x2200004.


Thanks you David

Comment 10 David GEIGER 2024-05-05 19:23:38 CEST

Packages in 9/Core/Updates_testing:
======================
gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-53-1.1.mga9.noarch.rpm

From SRPMS:
gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-53-1.1.mga9.src.rpm

katnatek 2024-05-06 01:19:39 CEST

Source RPM: (none) => gnome-shell-extension-appindicator

katnatek 2024-05-06 01:23:04 CEST

CC: (none) => andrewsfarm

Comment 11 katnatek 2024-05-06 01:23:38 CEST

Give OK due comment#9

Keywords: (none) => advisory
Whiteboard: (none) => MGA9-64-OK

Comment 12 Thomas Andrews 2024-05-06 02:46:05 CEST

Validating.

CC: (none) => sysadmin-bugs
Keywords: (none) => validated_update

Comment 13 Mageia Robot 2024-05-09 04:41:21 CEST

An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository.

https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2024-0137.html

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 14 Eric Petit 2024-05-18 13:27:05 CEST

Hi, bug come back, see log .
urpmi gnome-shell-extension-appindicator 
Le paquetage gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-53-1.1.mga9.noarch est déjà installé

Resolution: FIXED => (none)
Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED

Comment 15 Eric Petit 2024-05-18 13:27:31 CEST

Created attachment 14536 [details]
gnome-shell/extensions JS ERROR bis

Comment 16 Thomas Andrews 2024-05-18 14:44:22 CEST

This update has already been pushed. Don't we need a new bug if the issue has come back?

Comment 17 katnatek 2024-05-18 18:48:48 CEST

(In reply to Thomas Andrews from comment #16)
> This update has already been pushed. Don't we need a new bug if the issue
> has come back?

I agree, Eric Petit please open a new bug

Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 18 Eric Petit 2024-05-18 18:50:56 CEST

(In reply to katnatek from comment #17)
> (In reply to Thomas Andrews from comment #16)
> > This update has already been pushed. Don't we need a new bug if the issue
> > has come back?
> 
> I agree, Eric Petit please open a new bug

What, i need to do again the same content for the same bug?

Comment 19 katnatek 2024-05-18 19:21:28 CEST

Is a(In reply to Eric Petit from comment #18)
> (In reply to katnatek from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Thomas Andrews from comment #16)
> > > This update has already been pushed. Don't we need a new bug if the issue
> > > has come back?
> > 
> > I agree, Eric Petit please open a new bug
> 
> What, i need to do again the same content for the same bug?

I know this can bother to you but as this bug is considered as solved and advisory was published, the advisory is linked to the bug and package version, and we can't republish the advisory if the bug is solved with new version of same package or with the pubilshing of other package.